This study aims to map the structural landscape, collaborative networks, and thematic evolution of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) research via quantitative bibliometric analysis. By interpreting dataset structures rather than providing a traditional narrative review, it seeks to elucidate global research trends, identify key contributors, and uncover the thematic evolution shifting from basic mechanistic validation to clinical combination strategies. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed on 704 publications related to TTFields published between 2004 and 2025. Data were exclusively retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Quantitative analysis and visualization mapping were systematically executed using the bibliometrix R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to assess publication trends, collaborative networks, and keyword citation bursts. TTFields, a non-invasive anti-cancer treatment employing intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields, has demonstrated definitive efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) and malignant pleural mesothelioma, while retaining potent investigational prospects in other solid tumors (including non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer). Network analyses reveal that the foundational high-impact literature is predominately driven by a highly concentrated, industry-academic collaborative structure. Furthermore, keyword burst detection identifies a critical field transition from initial phase-III trial outcomes toward prioritizing clinical “safety” and exploring novel “immunotherapy” combinations. This study provides a visualized quantitative landscape of TTFields research. It highlights TTFields as an innovative and highly translational treatment modality. While current advancements have been efficiently accelerated by industry-sponsored networks, moving forward will increasingly require independent mechanistic verifications. The findings emphasize the necessity of addressing long-term post-market safety, overcoming drug delivery barriers, and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations—such as mathematical modeling and AI-assisted network pharmacology—to optimize future combinatorial therapies.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60