Skip to content
Open access

Impact of clinician experience on the accuracy of static guided implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a cadaver study

Jul 2026 · Clinical Oral Investigations · Vol 30 · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The use of s-CAIS in a cadaver model demonstrated predictable accuracy for immediate implant placement in post-extraction sockets irrespective of operator experience, and its use might be considered for clinical training sessions.

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of s-CAIS in immediate post-extraction sockets using a cadaver model and to assess whether operator experience influences implant placement precision and surgical time. Twenty teeth (incisors: 9; premolars: 8; molars: 3) were extracted from two fresh defrozen cadaver heads, and implants were planned using a digital workflow integrating cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning. Custom-made tooth-supported surgical guides were fabricated and used by two operators: one expert (> 5 years of experience) and one non-expert (< 5 years of experience), both without prior guided surgery experience. Twenty implants were placed. Post-operative scans were taken and superimposed to the pre-operative plans to measure global head deviation, global tip deviation, and angular deviation. Data were stratified by operator experience, jaw location, and implant position. No significant differences were found between expert and non-expert operators in head deviation (1.26 ± 0.51 mm vs. 1.54 ± 0.63 mm, p = 0.29), tip deviation (1.70 ± 0.50 mm vs. 1.81 ± 0.53 mm, p = 0.64), angular deviation (3.83 ± 1.90° vs. 3.32 ± 1.69°, p = 0.54), or surgical time (3.60 ± 1.45 min vs. 4.31 ± 2.67 min, p = 0.84). Anterior implants showed significantly greater head (1.69 ± 0.57 mm vs. 1.13 ± 0.46 mm, p = 0.03) and tip deviations (1.99 ± 0.41 mm vs. 1.54 ± 0.50 mm, p = 0.04) compared to posterior implants. Mandibular implants required longer surgical time than maxillary implants (4.90 ± 2.37 min vs. 2.87 ± 1.01 min, p = 0.03). Within the limitations of this cadaver study, s-CAIS demonstrated predictable accuracy for immediate implant placement in post-extraction sockets, with operator experience not significantly influencing placement precision or surgical time. Static guided surgery may standardize outcomes and support surgical training in implant dentistry. The use of s-CAIS in a cadaver model demonstrated predictable accuracy for immediate implant placement in post-extraction sockets irrespective of operator experience. Its use might be considered for clinical training sessions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Influence of clinician experience with a static computer-assisted implant surgery workflow on implant-placement accuracy across three surgical-guide designs: a clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES Although static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) is widely used, the influence of operator experience with guided workflows-distinct from general implant experience-remains unclear. This trial compared placement accuracy between experienced and novice operators in the sCAIS workflow across three sur...

Abdelrahman K. Eldabe, Kirollos H. Botros, George N. Farid Beshay et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Impact of Level of Guidance on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (s-CAIS): An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND Accurate implant placement is essential for predictable functional and esthetic outcomes. Although static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) is more accurate than freehand placement, the effects of increasing guidance within partially guided workflows and on adjacent-implant relationships remain uncl...

Eric C. MacFadden, Christopher Sobczak, A. Guentsch · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement on Different Cast Models

Introduction: To compare the accuracy of implant placement on mandibular models fabricated from different materials using a single digitally designed surgical guide, and to identify which model provided the highest precision and cost-effectiveness for research and training applications. Materials and Methods: Nine ide...

Raniah Isam Muwafaq al Khashali, Dr. Bayad Jaza Mahmood · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Digitally Guided Root Membrane Preparation Using a Dedicated Apex Guide for Immediate Implant Placement: A Retrospective Case Series.

OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical feasibility and 1-year outcomes of a static computer-assisted workflow using a dedicated Apex Guide for root membrane (RM) preparation and immediate implant placement. METHODS Fifteen consecutive patients with nine anterior and six posterior single-tooth sites were included. Cone-beam...

S. Omar, F. Mangano · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Surgical Efficiency, Learning Dynamics, and Positional Accuracy of Freehand Immediate Implant Placement Under Standardized Digital Planning: An In Vitro Study.

PURPOSE To characterize surgical efficiency and within-operator learning dynamics during freehand immediate post-extraction implant placement performed under standardized, prosthetically driven digital planning, and to describe the positional accuracy achieved across operators of differing experience in a 3D-printed ph...

C. Lorenzi, A. Pinto, A. Alrmali et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Digitized Physical Impressions Optimize Apical Adaptation of Bio-Root Inlays for Apexification: A Comparison of Four Impression Techniques

Objectives: To evaluate the three-dimensional adaptation of prefabricated Bio-Root inlays fabricated from impressions of simulated immature permanent root canals using four techniques: direct intraoral scanning (A), a light-body rubber impression digitized with an intraoral scanner (B), cone-beam computed tomography (C...

Yasser Alsayed Tolibah, Wahid Juha, Mhd Kheir Awad et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.