Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Dataset Open access

Data and results for: Deep reinforcement learning control of a grid-tied microgrid with a heat pump and PCM thermal storage

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Microgrid Control and Optimization

Abstract

This dataset accompanies the paper "Deep reinforcement learning control of a grid-tied microgrid with a heat pump and PCM thermal storage: a comparison with rule-based control in an experimentally calibrated simulation" (under review). The code is at https://github.com/fred-stanford/pcm-tes-microgrid-rl. The study trains deep Q-network (DQN) controllers for a simulated grid-tied microgrid in Half Moon Bay, California, with a 3.84 kW PV array, a 7.2 kWh battery, a reversible air-to-water heat pump, and hot and cold phase-change-material thermal energy storage (PCM TES). It compares them with a rule-based controller under a time-of-use tariff, an export credit, demand-response events, and grid outages. Controllers were trained on 2018–2022, selected on 2023, and tested on 2024. Files:- datasets.zip: 5-minute train (2018–2022), validation (2023), and test (2024) datasets with weather, PV capacity factor, building electrical load, import price, and export credit.- weather_nsrdb.zip: NSRDB 5-minute weather for the site, 2018–2024, from which the datasets are built.- test_year_traces.zip: 5-minute test-year simulation traces for the rule-based controller and for the controller selected for each of the 10 training seeds.- results_summary.zip: summary results behind the paper's tables and figures (test-year metrics, Monte-Carlo results over 100 grid-event schedules, learning curves, validation rankings).- models.zip: all 60 trained DQN controllers (10 seeds × 3 discount factors × 2 network depths), each with its validation-selected checkpoint (Stable-Baselines3) and full settings.- README.md: file contents and how to use them with the code.- SHA256SUMS.txt: checksums. Weather data are from the U.S. National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB, NREL). Import prices follow PG&E Electric Schedule E-ELEC, and export credits follow PG&E's Solar Billing Plan Energy Export Credit values. Building loads are synthetic.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.