Skip to content

Highly Configurable Evolutionary Multi‐Objective Optimisation and Application in UAV Path Planning

Oct 2026 · CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · 37 references
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multi‐objective optimisation is crucial in engineering and real‐world decision‐making. Although traditional decomposition‐based approaches such as MOEA/D yield reasonable results, they depend heavily on expert knowledge. Existing MetaBBO approaches partially alleviate this reliance, however, they offer limited configurability and lack real‐world validation. To address these limitations, we propose EMO‐CRL, a highly configurable Evolutionary Multi‐objective Optimisation framework through Collaborative Reinforcement Learning. We first construct a comprehensive configuration space encompassing multiple advanced MOEA/D mechanisms, effectively creating a unified structure for exploring diverse algorithmic variants. Recognising the inherent complexity of the high‐dimensional configuration space, EMO‐CRL then innovatively decomposes it into six sub‐spaces to enable efficient exploration. This decomposition is coupled with the formulation of dynamic algorithm configuration as a multi‐agent Markov Decision Process, featuring comprehensive state representation and finer‐grained action space. EMO‐CRL employs Value‐Decomposition Networks to collaboratively adapt agents across diverse scenarios, allowing effective knowledge sharing and improved decision‐making. Extensive evaluations on WFG and DTLZ benchmarks show that EMO‐CRL outperforms several state‐of‐the‐art MOEA/D variants. Furthermore, its application to UAV path planning highlights its practical effectiveness.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.