Skip to content

Collaborative optimization of electricity, computation, and thermal resources in data centers: Progress, challenges, and future directions

Oct 2026 · Energy Nexus · 49 references
Cloud Computing and Resource Management Energy Efficiency in Computing

Abstract

Data centers increasingly rely on coordinated operation across power, computation, and thermal management resources, but existing studies differ substantially in the resources coordinated, decision methods adopted, and evidence supporting their conclusions. This literature review synthesizes 311 unique studies spanning power–computation, power–thermal, computation–thermal, and power–computation–thermal coordination. The literature remains concentrated in pairwise coordination, particularly power–computation, while broader integration across all three domains has received growing but comparatively less attention. Across the four coupling families, scheduling and resource allocation remain prominent, whereas reinforcement learning and other advanced decision methods are being applied to increasingly diverse coordination problems. More importantly, broader resource integration is not consistently accompanied by stronger treatment of uncertainty, validation, or applicability. Differences in system boundaries, workloads, climates, infrastructure, baselines, and evaluation settings also limit the comparability and transferability of reported benefits. These findings suggest that future progress depends not only on expanding coordination scope, but also on establishing more reliable evidence for when and where coordinated flexibility is effective. Key priorities include quantifying usable flexibility under uncertainty, assessing the incremental value of broader coordination, strengthening validation, clarifying applicability domains, and improving comparability across studies.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.