Skip to content

From monolingual virtual exchange to AI-supported multilingualism: a critical perspective

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Computer Science · 17 references
Multilingual Education and Policy

Abstract

Virtual Exchange (VE) has become a key approach in higher education for fostering intercultural competence through online collaboration. However, despite its inclusive framing, many VE initiatives continue to rely on English as a lingua franca or other shared-language arrangements, which may reproduce linguistic hierarchies and unequal participation. This paper examines the potential of AI-supported multilingualism to rethink predominantly monolingual approaches to VE. It argues that while generative AI and translation technologies may reduce communicative barriers and enable broader participation, they do not automatically transform underlying language ideologies or power relations. In doing so, it highlights a tension between accessibility and the interactional work through which intercultural learning occurs. Drawing on Critical Virtual Exchange, relational learning, translanguaging theory, and ethical interculturality, the paper proposes a critical perspective on AI-mediated VE. It further explores how AI may support linguistic equity, multilingual participation, and translanguaging-oriented meaning-making in Virtual Exchange. At the same time, it critically addresses risks such as technological solutionism, linguistic bias in AI systems, and the reinforcement of dominant language ideologies. It concludes that AI-supported VE should be grounded in critical pedagogy and linguistic justice. In this way, VE is reframed not as a site of frictionless communication, but as a relational and ethically accountable educational practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.