Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model.
Dec 2026· Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open· Vol 7 6, pp.
100525
· 0 citations· 21 references
Medicine
Abstract
Objective
The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) intra-abdominal injury clinical prediction rule identifies children at very low risk for clinically significant intra-abdominal injury after blunt abdominal trauma. However, retrospective evaluation of the rule's use in practice requires resource-intensive chart review. We investigated whether large language models (LLMs) can automatically calculate PECARN intra-abdominal injury risk scores from real-world unstructured emergency department (ED) notes.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of children after blunt abdominal trauma presenting to 2 urban pediatric EDs. The LLM, OpenAI o1, was compared with clinician-derived standards for PECARN risk scores and predictor variable extraction from unstructured physician ED notes. Performance was assessed using standard diagnostic test characteristics.
Results
Among 196 children with complete ED notes, the LLM calculated binary PECARN risk scores with 95.4% accuracy (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5 to 98.3), 94.4% sensitivity (95% CI 90.6 to 98.2), 98.2% specificity (95% CI 94.6 to 100), and an F1 score of 0.97 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98). Agreement by weighted Cohen's kappa between multicategorical LLM-derived risk scores and clinician-derived risk scores was high, 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00). Predictor variable extraction demonstrated strong performance across all PECARN variables, with accuracy greater than 94%.
Conclusion
The LLM had comparable performance to clinicians in calculating binary and multicategorical PECARN intra-abdominal injury risk scores and extracting predictor variables from unstructured ED notes. LLMs may enable automated calculation of clinical prediction rules from clinical documentation.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The findings show that speed related agile practices are used to a greater extent in comparison to quality practices, and that software startups who adopt the Lean Startup approach do not sacrifice quality for speed more than other startups do.
Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Marco Mondini, Dron Khanna et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡4
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.