Skip to content
Open access

EP1.68 Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy in a Single Surgical Setting for the Treatment of Symptomatic Adult Hip Dysplasia

Oct 2026 · Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery · Vol 13, pp. i107 - i107 · 0 citations · 3 references

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic outcomes, operative time, and complication rates in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) combined with hip arthroscopy in a single surgical setting for the treatment of intra-articular pathology. Methods A retrospective study was conducted including a consecutive series of 63 patients who underwent combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy in a single surgical setting under one anesthesia between 2011 and 2025 at a single institution, constituting the study group. During the same period, 78 patients with hip dysplasia were treated with isolated PAO in a non-randomized fashion, constituting the control group. Both groups together formed a final cohort of 141 patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p>0.05). Radiographic variables were assessed in patients with complete imaging data. In the study group, arthroscopic findings and intra-articular procedures were analyzed. Outcome measures included mHHS, HOOS, and UCLA scores, as well as postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results Significant radiographic improvement was observed in both groups. In the isolated PAO group, LCEA improved from 20.75 ± 8.59° to 33.74 ± 5.34°, while in the combined group it improved from 20.46 ± 8.92° to 33.05 ± 7.88° (both p<0.001). The magnitude of correction was similar between groups (12.99 ± 7.2° vs 12.59 ± 7.8°; p=0.74), with no differences in postoperative LCEA (p>0.05). In the PAO + arthroscopy group (n=63), labral repair was performed in 48 patients (77.4%), with a mean of 2.1 ± 0.8 anchors per case (range 1–3). No repair was required in 22.6%, including cases treated with debridement or radiofrequency stabilization, while in 2 patients (3.2%) no intra-articular lesions requiring treatment were identified. Operative time was significantly longer when both techniques were combined (132.4 ± 57.8 min) compared to isolated PAO (109.6 ± 39.2 min; p=0.015). Significant postoperative improvements were observed in all PROMs: mHHS (63.3 ± 8.8 to 93.1 ± 8.0), HOOS (61.6 ± 8.3 to 92.3 ± 8.5), and UCLA (all p<0.01). MCID and PASS were achieved in over 95% of patients for mHHS and HOOS, while SCB was achieved in approximately 70%. The overall complication rate was low and comparable between groups (5.1% vs 9.5%; p=0.25), with no differences in reoperation rates. Complications were mainly related to the osteotomy procedure. Conclusion The combination of hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy in a single surgical setting for the treatment of symptomatic adult hip dysplasia demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes without increasing complication rates. Although intra-articular lesions were identified and treated in 97% of cases, these results did not differ significantly from those of isolated periacetabular osteotomy.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.