Skip to content
Open access

FaceBench: A Locked-Pipeline Comparative Evaluation of Five Off-the-Shelf Face Recognizers across Pose, Age, and Resolution

Aug 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · 0 citations

Abstract

 Fair comparison of pretrained face recognition models is often confounded by vendor-specific detectors, incompatible crop geometries, and accuracy-only reporting at an unstated decision threshold. This paper presents FaceBench, a reproducible evaluation framework, and reports a locked comparative study of five off-the-shelf recognizers — FaceNet, Dlib, InsightFace Buffalo-L, AdaFace, and MagFace — under one shared RetinaFace/SCRFD detect-and-crop protocol (Baseline B: bounding-box margin 0.35, cosine operating point 0.40). Primary evidence spans pairwise verification on four high-quality (HQ) benchmarks — LFW, CFP-FP, CPLFW, and AgeDB-30 — covering frontal, cross-pose, and cross-age conditions, together with dedicated uncached embedding throughput, pairwise McNemar significance tests against the leading model, LFW closed-set Rank-1 identification as a function of gallery size N ∈ {10, 100, 500, 1000}, and an accuracy–efficiency synthesis. Buffalo-L attains the highest mean verification accuracy across the four HQ sets (0.9045) at 27.63 frames/s on the reported workstation; MagFace and AdaFace are the fastest embedders (97.60 and 92.83 frames/s) but measurably weaker on hard-pose accuracy at the shared cosine threshold; Dlib retains a high ROC-AUC and low equal error rate (EER) yet its fixed-threshold accuracy collapses to chance level because the fixed cosine threshold of 0.40 is poorly calibrated for Dlib's similarity distribution. Every accuracy gap against Buffalo-L is statistically significant under McNemar's test (all p < 0.001; closest is CPLFW versus FaceNet, p = 4.2×10⁻⁵). A supplementary TinyFace Rank-1 probe (Gallery_Match versus Probe, N ≤ 500) is reported separately from the HQ means and is explicitly not official TinyFace mean average precision. Source code and experiment manifests are released under an MIT license; face images are used under each dataset's original terms and are not redistributed.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.