Jul 2026· International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research· Vol 8· 0 citations· 24 references
TL;DR
It is argued that while AI presents utilitarian value as an assistive tool, its unregulated deployment as an independent author constitutes a threat not only to individual writers but to the cultural and intellectual vitality of society at large.
Abstract
The emergence of large language models and generative artificial intelligence has introduced a profound disruption to the literary ecosystem. This paper examines how AI-generated literature threatens to displace human authorship, suppress the creative voices of writers, and destabilise the ethical and commercial foundations of literary production. Drawing on contemporary research in cognitive psychology, digital humanities, and publishing industry data, the study investigates three core concerns, namely the erosion of the writer’s creative agency, the commodification of literary output, and the philosophical crisis of intentionality and authorship in the age of machine-generated text. The paper argues that while AI presents utilitarian value as an assistive tool, its unregulated deployment as an independent author constitutes a threat not only to individual writers but to the cultural and intellectual vitality of society at large.
This paper argues that AI-generated literature does not so much destroy literary authenticity as force a reconfiguration of what the term has always meant, and concludes that a more defensible, procedural model of authenticity is emerging one grounded in disclosed, traceable human judgment rather than the simple fact...
Shipra Malik· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
It is concluded that resistance to attributing creativity to GenAI reflects genuine conceptual distinctions alongside persistent anthropocentric assumptions, and that current deployment practices carry ethical implications that demand an institutional response rather than case-by-case management.
This essay examines Death of an Author (2023), an AI-assisted detective novella by “Aidan Marchine”, as a case study for understanding the philosophical, aesthetic, and technical dimensions of generative literature.
It is argued that AI does not eliminate the author but redistributes authorial agency across socio-technical assemblages in which writers, models, interfaces, publishers, platforms, critics and audiences participate in the production of legitimacy.
A theoretical map of the main positions in the existing literature is offered, organized around three conceptual thresholds that structure the authors' perception of authorship in AI-generated works, highlighting both their argumentative strengths and limitations.
The research uses a qualitative method to analyze seven selected passages from the novel at the textual, discursive, and sociocultural levels, showing that the novel presents artificial intelligence as both similar to and different from humans.
S. Hadi, B. Hassan· مجلة واسط للعلوم الانسانية· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.