Skip to content
Review Open access

Olanzapine for the Prevention and Treatment of ICU Delirium: Protocol for a Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis

Oct 2026 · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · Vol 70 · 0 citations · 60 references
Medicine

TL;DR

An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis is performed to assess the benefits and harms of olanzapine for the prevention and treatment of ICU delirium in ICU patients and it is hoped this review will inform future RCTs and improve clinical practice.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is a multifactorial acute brain dysfunction associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and mortality, and higher healthcare costs. Despite these substantial negative impacts of delirium, the optimal prevention and treatment strategies are unclear. Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, is commonly used for delirium management. We will perform an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the benefits and harms of olanzapine for the prevention and treatment of ICU delirium. Methods This protocol is developed in accordance with the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration and is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis Protocols (PRISMA‐P) guidelines. We will include all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating prophylactic or therapeutic olanzapine versus any comparator, including pharmacological, non‐pharmacological, placebo, or routine care/no specific delirium‐directed intervention (treated as a single comparator) in ICU patients. Observational studies will be included solely to address potential harms. We will systematically search the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO, as well as clinical trial registries. We will perform meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to investigate the risk of both Type I and II errors. We will assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB‐2). The quality of trials will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. The review is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420261474813). Outcomes The primary outcome is days alive and out of the hospital. The secondary outcomes include all‐cause mortality at 90 days, number of CAM‐ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit) negative days at 30 days, number of days without pharmacological treatment for delirium other than study drug during the intervention period and serious intervention‐related harms. Discussion This protocol outlines the methodology we will use in a systematic review with meta‐analysis designed to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of olanzapine for prevention and treatment of delirium in ICU patients. The findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer‐reviewed publication. We hope this review will inform future RCTs and improve clinical practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing postoperative delirium in adult ICU patients found non-pharmacological interventions significantly reduced the risk of postoperative delirium compared with control conditions.

Matías Fuentealba-Márquez, D. Prieto-Merino, M. López-Espinoza · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Non-opioid pharmacologic interventions for the prevention of delirium after cardiac surgery in adults: systematic review and network meta analysis

Based on low-certainty evidence, esketamine may lower the incidence of POD in adult cardiac surgery patients, while it is uncertain whether risperidone and dexmedetomidine prevent POD due to very low-certainty evidence.

Meng Yan, Hao-Qi Yan, Hong-Bai Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study demonstrated that multi-component interventions effectively reduce delirium incidence in critically ill patients, and the evidence did not establish that one component combination was superior to another.

Shi-Ting Wang, Jia-Min Lei, Wen-Jing Huang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Treatment of Delirium in Septic Shock Patients: A Focused Evidence Review

Objective: To review pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for established delirium in adults with septic shock. Place and Duration of Study: This review was conducted Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, King Abdullah Specialized Hospital, Ministry of National Guards Healt...

M. Rana, M. Alkhlewi, K. Sifaoui et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

TREATMENT STRATEGIES AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO DELIRIUM IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Delirium is an acute, fluctuating neuropsychiatric syndrome with a high prevalence among hospitalized elderly patients; it is associated with increased mortality, functional and cognitive decline, and institutionalization. This integrative review synthesizes evidence regarding the prevention and treatment of the condit...

Fernando Malachias de Andrade Bergamo, Bruno Henrique Monteiro de Barros, Rebeca Aniela Sandri Pozza et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Specialized Delirium Care Environments in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Specialized delirium care environments appear promising for the management of delirium in hospitalized older adults, particularly for outcomes closely related to day-to-day delirium care, but the current evidence base is limited.

Henri Perrin, G. Mastria, Alberto-José Garcia Manjon et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.