Skip to content
Open access

Algorithmic deterrence: A new strategic logic in the era of artificial intelligence

2026 · Nacionalni interes · Vol 54, pp. 31-52 · 0 citations · 32 references

TL;DR

It is argued that smaller states, such as Serbia, can develop asymmetric models of intelligent deterrence in the cyber and cognitive domains within the concept of total defence and digital sovereignty.

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence represents a turning point in the modern understanding of deterrence strategy, shifting its focus from material power to information, perception, and the algorithmic management of actor behaviour. The classic concept of deterrence, as advocated by Thomas Schelling and Bernard Brodie, based on rational cost-benefit assessment, loses its predictive power in conditions of accelerated decision-making, autonomous systems, and algorithmic opacity. Instead of a stable "balance of fear", a state of dynamic instability arises, in which speed, information asymmetry and cognitive effects become key factors of strategic equilibrium. The paper's starting hypothesis is that artificial intelligence does not nullify deterrence but transforms it through a new cognitive and informational dimension: "algorithmic deterrence". Defence is no longer aimed exclusively at inflicting unacceptable damage, but at managing the adversary's perception, expectations, and behaviour in real time. Autonomous systems, machine learning, and predictive models enable the development of "intelligent deterrence" based on tailored strategic signals and algorithmic analysis of behaviour. Special attention is paid to the concepts of cognitive and information deterrence as modern forms of strategic communication. In this context, the paper argues that smaller states, such as Serbia, can develop asymmetric models of intelligent deterrence in the cyber and cognitive domains within the concept of total defence and digital sovereignty. In conclusion, the revitalisation of deterrence does not imply a return to classical models, but their transformation into a system of dynamic risk, information and perception management in the era of artificial intelligence.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Algorithmic isomorphism and the erosion of competitive advantage in the age of artificial intelligence: A review of emerging risks in strategic management

The article analyzes how the imperfections of artificial intelligence systems such as the lack of transparency, inherent database bias and their Western-centric nature can lead to the reproduction of identical market behaviour patterns and points to the necessity of balancing technological innovation with a human-centr...

P. Czerski · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Beyond determinism: Legal responsibility in the age of probabilistic AI systems

This paper examines the fundamental distinction between classical deterministic programming and contemporary artificial intelligence systems, with particular emphasis on the legal consequences arising from the non-deterministic behavior of AI models. By analyzing the basic postulates of programming, the Softmax functio...

Žaklina Spalević, R. Ivković, Milan Ječmenić · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW

It is too early to definitively predict how generative artificial intelligence (‘AI’) will affect the law and the legal profession. How much of the hype will come to pass, or whether the effects of AI will be revolutionary or evolutionary is yet unknown. Although the extent of those effects may not be fully evident tod...

David G. Millhouse · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Algorithmic Determinism vs. Executive Agency: A Theoretical Examination of Strategic Management in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This conceptual paper asks where executive agency goes when strategic decisions pass through algorithmic systems, and develops a framework of configured discretion that recasts the two-continua model of organizational adaptation for firms whose constraints are partly self-made.

Wei Chen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Fear, power, and superintelligence: A realist reframing of AI catastrophic risk

Debates on catastrophic artificial intelligence (AI) risk often frame artificial superintelligence as a problem of value alignment: the central task is to ensure that advanced systems act in accordance with human intentions or moral principles. This article argues that such a framing is necessary but insufficient. The...

C. Burelli, Federico Formentini · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Financial Decision-Making: Opportunities, Risks, and Challenges

The dual nature of AI adoption in finance is examined, with AI materially improves predictive accuracy, operational efficiency, and access to financial services, with adoption accelerating sharply since the introduction of generative and agentic AI tools.

Abhishek Rajan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.