Skip to content
Conference

Connecting Uncertainty Quantification to Safety Engineering: Uncertainty Gate Framework for Safe ML Decision Making

Jul 2026 · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Testing · pp. 164-169 · 0 citations · 20 references

Abstract

Deploying Machine Learning (ML) models in safety-critical domains requires connecting their behavior to safety engineering standards such as IEC 61508. These standards focus on mitigating systematic failures in software, yet ML models also exhibit failures that are better treated as random and thus fall outside this scope. Uncertainty quantification can characterize such failures through a per-prediction uncertainty score, but a score alone does not determine whether an output is safe; this requires an additional step, referred to as uncertainty handling.This work introduces Uncertainty Gate, an uncertainty-handling framework that is agnostic to both the underlying ML model and the source of uncertainty. The framework treats the uncertainty score as an online diagnostic that accepts or rejects each prediction against a threshold. It then connects the resulting risk to IEC 61508 through a finite-sample bound, which accommodates dependent (non-i.i.d.) test data via a proper cover number. This allows practitioners to determine whether a given dataset and model meet a target Safety Integrity Level (SIL), and how much test data such a guarantee requires. We demonstrate the framework on a worked example targeting SIL 1 and discuss its use cases, extensions, and limitations.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

CUBICS: Situation-aware performance estimation for safety-relevant ML components

CUBICS partitions the operational design domain into situations and, for each safety-relevant component, defines a set of situation-specific assumptions and probabilistic guarantees that are represented and updated in a Bayesian manner using Subjective Logic (SL).

Benjamin Herd, Jessica Kelly, Mario Trapp · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning for Reliable Decision-Making in Data-Driven Systems

An uncertainty-aware machine learning framework that integrates probabilistic modeling techniques into conventional predictive architectures to jointly estimate epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty is proposed, indicating that incorporating uncertainty estimation enhances trustworthiness and robustness without sacrifici...

Evi Yulianingsih, E. Noche, V. Yadav et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Uncertainty-aware Design Decisions through Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification and Consistent Merging

When developing complex, software-intensive or cyber-physical systems, uncertainty must be managed during all stages. Especially if made explicit, it can significantly affect the design decisions of various stakeholders. A necessary requirement for determining the effect of uncertainty on a system and deciding whether...

Nathan Hagel, Johannes Mäkelburg, Alireza Maleki et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

ProbGuard: Calibrated Safety Risk Estimation from LLM Output Distributions

This work proposes the first completely probabilistic architecture-agnostic guardrail to leverage the LLM early output distributional signals for estimating and calibrating the safety probability, thereby enabling early stopping of unsafe ongoing outputs.

Xinzhe Huang, Biwu Yao, Kedong Xiu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Overlooked Role of Uncertainty in Machine Learning Predictions: A Systematic Review

Uncertainty estimate is redefined as essential to machine learning performance rather than as a byproduct, and a systematic research program centered on unified theoretical frameworks, uniform evaluation procedures, domain-sensitive calibration, and scalable uncertainty-aware structures is suggested.

Precious Chidum Amadi · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Uncertainty-Aware Domain-Specific Large Language Model for Maintenance Decision-Making on Wind Farms

Wind farm maintenance planning requires better strategies that reduce operation and maintenance cost under uncertainty. Traditional methods can produce feasible solutions, but they usually rely on explicit modeling and scenario-specific solving setups, which limits flexibility when scenarios or uncertainty settings cha...

Zhuo-Chen Liu, Wen-Qiang Yin, Dong-Ming Fan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.