Ethical issues at the intersection of artificial intelligence and sustainability: A systematic review and its implications for science, mathematics, and technology education
Oct 2026· Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education· 102 references
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly presented as a tool for sustainable development, yet the ethical costs of this role remain scattered across separate bodies of literature. This systematic review aims to identify the ethical issues arising at the intersection of AI, ethics, and sustainability. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 statement, Scopus and Web of Science were searched in February 2026, yielding 5,794 records. Screening, eligibility assessment and quality appraisal were carried out by two researchers, and 74 studies were included. Verbatim passages addressing the intersection were extracted from each study and examined using a hybrid thematic approach, resulting in 921 coded passages. Five themes were identified: algorithmic bias and unequal AI outcomes; privacy, surveillance, and human autonomy; transparency, accountability, and epistemic integrity; AI governance and corporate responsibility; and the ecological ethics of AI systems. Concerns regarding transparency and accountability accounted for the largest share of passages (30.9%), while ecological concerns were voiced across all five themes rather than in a separate discussion. The themes were mapped onto the environmental, social, and governance dimensions of sustainability and onto the United Nations sustainable development goals. Transparency and accountability thus emerge as a structural prerequisite rather than a procedural add-on for sustainable AI. Educational research is markedly underrepresented at this intersection (5 of 74 studies); the implications of the five themes for science, mathematics, and technology education are therefore developed in detail, from carbon- and water-footprint modelling tasks to data-justice and AI-literacy work in the classroom.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60