Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

A Review of Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks

Oct 2026 · Informatics · 0 citations · 42 references
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems

Abstract

Underwater acoustic sensor networks (UASNs) are key enabling technology for the Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT), supporting environmental monitoring, offshore exploration, disaster warning and surveillance. Existing routing approaches include depth- and hop-by-hop schemes, geographic/vector-based forwarding, clustering, opportunistic and cross-layer routing, and more recent reinforcement-learning and multi-modal designs. Depth-based methods are simple and localization-free but can create redundant forwarding and energy hotspots near sinks; geographic methods provide directional forwarding but depend on difficult underwater localization; clustering improves scalability and aggregation efficiency but incurs cluster-head and re-clustering overhead; opportunistic methods improve robustness to unreliable links but add coordination cost; and learning-based methods adapt to dynamic channels but introduce computation, memory and convergence overhead. This review develops a two-axis taxonomy that separates localization requirements from forwarding strategy, critically compares representative energy-efficient protocols, links routing choices to security and privacy risks, and identifies open questions in secure learning, energy harvesting and acoustic-optical-RF modality switching. The analysis emphasizes the trade-off among network lifetime, packet delivery reliability, delay, control overhead, scalability and security, and it provides a protocol-suitability matrix for selecting routing families for practical UASNs.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.