Skip to content

HyperFusionNet: An Intelligent DRL Framework with Neural Attention and Memory Integration for Optimized IoT Communication and Energy Efficiency

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract

The sheer increase in IoT networks has created major challenges in the effective management of data communication, and high latency, limited power supply resources, and unreliable networks are some of the problems that have been encountered. All these limitations pose challenges to the scalability and performance of the IoT system, and more sophisticated data routing, energy consumption, and network stability optimization solutions are required. In this study, it is suggested to use HyperFusionNet, a progressive Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) model aimed at maximizing communication in a large-scale IoT network. HyperFusionNet extends the use of the attention and memory modules in neurons with the objective of reducing latency, improving throughput and increasing network lifetime, i.e., tackling the limitations of energy and large loads of data in IoTs. The framework was evaluated over 100 simulated episodes and converged within 80 episodes, achieving a normalized average cumulative reward of 960. Across the evaluated conditions, HyperFusionNet maintained latency of 90-120 ms, a throughput of 900-1200 bps, PDR of 95-99%, and an average network power of 1000-1050 mW. Under the common experimental pipeline, it provided approximately 15% lower latency, 12% higher throughput, and a 20% improvement in network lifetime relative to the internal reference configuration. Also, the energy used per node was reduced by almost one-fifth that of other routing protocols, increasing life span of the network by nearly one-fifth. The DRL agent used in HyperFusionNet is the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) that has curiosity-based exploration and reward shaping strategy to adapt to real-time network conditions. The model converged in 80 episodes with an average cumulative reward of 960 and a robustness of their policy that retained 95% reliability in the unfavorable conditions, e.g., higher traffic and node failures.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.