Skip to content

Inverse Synthesis of Shock Time Series from Shock Response Spectra Using Ensembles of Conditional Variational Autoencoders

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 20 references
Computer Science Engineering

TL;DR

An earlier conditional variational autoencoder framework is extended with a recurrent decoder that predicts multiscale wavelet coefficients and reconstructs waveforms through an inverse discrete wavelet transform and demonstrates superior performance across four holdout benchmark datasets and competitive performance on synthetic targets reported by Brake.

Abstract

The shock response spectrum (SRS) characterizes the peak responses of single-degree-of-freedom systems to transient acceleration. Because the mapping from an acceleration time series (waveform) to its SRS is many-to-one, inverse synthesis seeks candidate waveforms consistent with a prescribed spectrum. We extend an earlier conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) framework with a recurrent decoder that predicts multiscale wavelet coefficients and reconstructs waveforms through an inverse discrete wavelet transform. Individual models exhibit limited variability under latent sampling, motivating an ensemble of independently trained models spanning different mother wavelets and decomposition levels. Each member produces a separate candidate waveform for the same target SRS. Evaluation on four held-out benchmark datasets shows lower mean and median spectral errors for the illustrated wavelet model than for the earlier direct time-domain CVAE and a sum-of-decayed-sinusoids (SDS) baseline. A conditioning study examines frequency-grid and encoding choices. Comparisons with published inverse-SRS methods demonstrate superior performance across four holdout benchmark datasets (two operational shock datasets, one earthquake dataset, and one synthetic shock dataset) and competitive performance on synthetic targets reported by Brake. Single-model inference requires approximately 0.1-0.6 ms per waveform during batched inference compared with 5-8 s for SDS, excluding offline training. This low inference cost enables rapid generation of distinct SRS-compatible candidate waveforms across the ensemble, although their physical suitability requires assessment beyond spectral agreement.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.