Skip to content

RadSight: Towards Perceptually Reliable Multimodal Radiology Image Understanding

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.22293 · 0 citations · 56 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

RadSight is proposed, a perception-driven MLLM built upon a dual 2D/3D encoder architecture that preserves native imaging spatial structures that achieves consistent improvements on public 2D and 3D medical benchmarks, further demonstrating that robust low-level visual perception is a critical foundation for reliable clinical understanding.

Abstract

Medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly expected to perform complex image understanding tasks, yet their reliability is often compromised by frequent errors in visual interpretation. To systematically trace these failures, we traverse the hierarchy from high-level clinical tasks down to fundamental visual perception. We therefore introduce Perception-Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising 1.13 million samples that assesses medical MLLMs across six dimensions: attribute judgment, spatial grounding, spatial understanding, disease prediction, anomaly detection, and report generation, spanning both 2D and 3D radiology images. Our analysis on Perception-Bench reveals that existing MLLMs lack the ability to capture even the most basic lesion attributes, such as location, size, and density. This inability to ground clinical outputs in primary visual evidence reveals that the models'diagnostic unreliability is rooted in a critical but overlooked bottleneck in low-level visual perception. Motivated by this, we propose RadSight, a perception-driven MLLM built upon a dual 2D/3D encoder architecture that preserves native imaging spatial structures. RadSight formulates medical image understanding as a four-stage progressive process: visual-language alignment, fine-grained visual perception, clinical diagnosis, and diagnostic interpretation. The model is trained on an 8.37 million perception-oriented corpus using progressive curriculum learning. On Perception-Bench, RadSight consistently outperforms existing MLLMs across all six evaluation dimensions, with particularly strong gains in spatial grounding and clinical diagnosis. It also achieves consistent improvements on public 2D and 3D medical benchmarks, further demonstrating that robust low-level visual perception is a critical foundation for reliable clinical understanding. Code and model will be publicly available.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Radiological VQA with Multimodal LLMs: Performance and Insights

The findings reinforce that MLLMs currently serve best as assistive decisionsupport tools rather than autonomous diagnostic agents, and highlight the potential of retrieval-augmented and context-aware strategies for improving clinical reliability and interpretability.

Cristovão Pessoa Cândido, Matheus Alves de Oliveira Lima, C. de Souza Baptista et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Can Multimodal Large Language Models Understand OCT?

OCT-Bench enables comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation of MLLMs, providing a foundation for identifying capability bottlenecks and advancing clinically grounded OCT understanding.

Baochen Fu, Wenzhi Deng, Baihao Jin et al. · 3 citations
Jul 2026

PathView-Bench: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Achieve Fine-grained Multiscale Understanding of Pathology Images?

PathVU is introduced, a vision-anchored benchmark for fine-grained and multiscale visual understanding in computational pathology that provides a reproducible basis for developing and evaluating pathology MLLMs with explicit multiscale visual understanding.

Zongyi Chen, Yu-Ping Liang, Jie Lin et al. · 2 citations
Jul 2026

Towards Enhancing 3D Spatial Reasoning in Medical Multimodal Large Language Models

A large-scale structured reasoning dataset constructed via a novel slice-wise data synthesis paradigm that unlocks deep volumetric understanding and highly interpretable clinical logic without requiring computationally expensive 3D-specific pre-training is introduced.

Zhuoyuan Fu, Zeshang Li, Yiqiong Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Do Accuracy Gains Reflect Genuine Visual Understanding? A Multi-Model Evaluation of Vision-Language Models in Thoracic Imaging.

Even at the highest accuracy observed here, answer-level performance can overstate visual understanding, pointing to the need for more appropriate evaluation methods that assess whether a model's reasoning is faithful to the image, not only whether its answer is correct.

Jiyoung Song, Won Gi Jeong, Hongseok Ko et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Volumetric Radiology AI in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models

This Review examines volumetric foundation models, language alignment and compression strategies, and agentic systems that extend MLLMs through planning, tools, memory, and workflow interaction, and introduces a Claim-Design-Validation framework to assess whether technical, workflow, and clinical claims are matched by...

Zan-Ting Ye, Shengyuan Liu, Xin Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.