Skip to content
Preprint

PrefixPlace: Provable Prefix Key-Value Placement for Large Language Model Serving under Heterogeneous Compute and Transfer Costs

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 24 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An epoch-level planner, PrefixPlace, which assigns prefix-complete targets under memory budgets and profiled demand, compute, and transfer costs, and solves a 50,000-node, 16-worker placement in 12.3 s on one processor, enabling timely replanning.

Abstract

Prefix Key-Value (KV) reuse avoids repeated prefill in Large Language Model (LLM) inference, but local misses require recomputation or replica fetches. Their relative cost varies with hardware, prefix depth, KV goodput, and replica location, making hit-rate-based placement suboptimal. To address this issue, we propose an epoch-level planner, PrefixPlace, which assigns prefix-complete targets under memory budgets and profiled demand, compute, and transfer costs. The objective decomposes into local-copy value plus first-replica coverage, and source-dependent costs yield a monotone facility-location objective; each worker update is an additive rooted-tree problem solved exactly in O(nk) time for n chunks and capacity k, giving a fixed-order 1/2-approximation that coordinate refinement and order-diverse starts improve without weakening. T4, L4, and A100 measurements reveal distinct regimes. Across 432 instances with exact optima, PrefixPlace averages 99.84% of optimum and never falls below 98.02%. In Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) replays, it improves materialization-cost saving by 40.3% over vLLM Automatic Prefix Caching (vLLM-APC) and 6.3% over the best offline baseline. On WikiQA, gains are 40.4% and 5.3%. Finally, PrefixPlace solves a 50,000-node, 16-worker placement in 12.3 s on one processor, enabling timely replanning.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Preserving Admission Responsibility in Multi-Tenant Large Language Model Prefix Caches

Results show that object-value signals rank what to retain, while persistent responsibility determines which group bears reclamation pressure, which shows that object-value signals rank what to retain, while persistent responsibility determines which group bears reclamation pressure.

Zhi-Yu Wang, Rajkummar Buyya · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TOPAS: Workflow-Aware Prefix-State Scheduling for Multi-Agent LLM Serving

A Task-Oriented Prefix-Aware Scheduler that jointly decides which agent prefixes to keep in the cache and which requests to schedule for execution and scores candidate post-decision states by trading off the expected reduction in each task's longest remaining service path against the near-term benefit of downstream pre...

Hongqiu Ni, Han Tian, Chi Zhang et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Every Cache Entry Earns Its Place: Global Allocation of Resolution and Coverage for KV Cache Compression

GraceKV is proposed, a global approach for the allocation of resolution and coverage in KV cache compression, and the compression process is formulated as a global resource allocation problem under a fixed cache budget to validate the effectiveness of global budget allocation in coordinating information coverage and lo...

Haolin Tian, Yuzhe Liu, Tong-Han Wang · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Pegasus: Accelerating Large Language Model Inference with Stateful Prefix Caching

Modern large language model (LLM) inference suffers from severe Time-To-First-Token (TTFT) bottlenecks. Existing prefix KV caching mechanisms are inherently stateless, forcing a trade-off between cross-chunk attention accuracy and online recomputation overhead. To address this issue, we propose Pegasus, a novel statefu...

Fahao Chen, Peng Li, Dongxiao Yu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.