Skip to content
Preprint

APPA: Recoverable Information-Flow Control for Real-World LLM Agents

Jul 2026 · 1 citation · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

APPA (Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra), which turns agent IFC from an abort-only barrier into a policy-governed recovery system, and proves core safety invariants: no-laundering gradual resolution, branch boundary isolation, and recovery containment against prompt-injected models.

Abstract

LLM agents deployed in practical workflows routinely mix private context, untrusted tool and web outputs, and external side effects. While information-flow control (IFC) provides structural defenses against prompt injection, data exfiltration, and confused-deputy attacks, conventional IFC relies on monotone taint tracking that either over-blocks benign operations or permanently strands downstream execution once an agent ingests unvetted data. We present APPA (Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra), which turns agent IFC from an abort-only barrier into a policy-governed recovery system. APPA enforces a dual-phase reference monitor at tool dispatch and protocol gateways (e.g., Model Context Protocol): before tool execution, it prospectively evaluates composite label restrictions and workflow history; upon completion, it validates realized outputs before context admission. For incremental rollout across unannotated tools, APPA incorporates gradual security typing with bounded cast resolution. To inspect untrusted data without poisoning primary agent context, APPA introduces on-demand trajectory confinement: disposable child branches absorb taint locally and exit through shape-bounded channels (attest-schema) with exact parent-label and transcript preservation, avoiding permanently partitioned multi-agent infrastructure. We prove core safety invariants: no-laundering gradual resolution, branch boundary isolation, and recovery containment against prompt-injected models. Across 6,600 controlled benchmark episodes spanning OWASP AgentThreatBench and enterprise workflows (Bench-Corp), APPA sustains 64.2-91% utility with zero observed attacks across 1,320 guarded episodes, establishing a practical defense for deployed tool-using agents.

View source

Similar papers

2026

Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra for Taint Confinement in LLM Agents

APPA ( Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra), an IFC framework that resolves this usability bottleneck through engine-managed context branching and prospective acquisition enforcement, is presented and formally proves parent label preservation and merge confinement.

Arseny Kravchenko, V. Liventsev, I. Konstantinov et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

AgentFlow: A Flow-Centric Policy Language and Framework for Securing LLM Agent Systems

AgentFlow, a flow-centric policy language and runtime enforcement model for specifying where data may travel in agent systems, is presented and results are preliminary and scoped to the modeled policy-visible agent behaviors and evaluated benchmarks.

B. Shivakumar, Swarn Priya, Peng Gao · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Reachability-Based Capability Confinement for LLM Agents under Indirect Prompt Injection

SkillGuard is presented, a harness-level enforcement layer that treats this event as contamination and restricts future capabilities to disconnect the resulting state from deployer-defined forbidden states and preserves substantially more capabilities than binary restriction at the same attack success rate.

Wu-Jie Xiong, Rabimba Karanjai, Yang Lu et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ROPE: Routed Origin Policy Enforcement against Indirect Prompt Injection

ROPE is presented, which is anchored in a structural notion of trust, and holds attack success rate to 1.6--2.6 while retaining 82--100% of undefended clean utility, significantly exceeding state-of-the-art system-level defenses in utility while attaining comparable or better security.

Xinhang Ma, Chao-Wei Xiao, William Yeoh et al. · 3 citations · ⚡2
Review Aug 2026

ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents

This work argues that agentic risk is progressive: it can enter at four loci of the agent control loop--skill admission, invocation-time intent, execution-time effect, and post-action consequence--while a denied dangerous objective can reappear across surface forms, tools, or turns.

Kai Wang, Zeming Wei, Biaojie Zeng et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.