Skip to content
Review Open access

NAVIGATE‐AI Nursing Framework: A Scoping Review and Preliminary Expert Content Evaluation for Safe Bedside AI Use in Nursing

Jan 2026 · Journal of Nursing Management · Vol 2026 · 0 citations · 23 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The framework is an evidence‐informed cognitive aid, not a validated clinical decision rule, and further iterative expert consensus and prospective usability, feasibility, and implementation testing are required before broad application.

Abstract

Aim To synthesize evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in nursing clinical practice and to develop and evaluate the content relevance of an evidence‐informed, bedside‐oriented mnemonic framework supporting nurses’ safe and critical use of AI‐supported recommendations. Background AI is increasingly integrated into nursing clinical practice, yet bedside nurses require concise guidance to appraise and use AI‐supported recommendations safely and ethically. Existing frameworks address organizational adoption or AI literacy education; a point‐of‐care cognitive aid for critical appraisal of AI outputs remains underdeveloped. Evaluation A scoping review, reported in accordance with PRISMA‐ScR, searched PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for English‐language publications from January 2015 to September 2026. Fourteen eligible sources were synthesized into five themes. An evidence‐informed seven‐component bedside cognitive guide was subsequently developed and evaluated by a purposively selected panel of 31 nursing and healthcare professionals using item‐ and scale‐level content validity indices. Key Issue Relevance I‐CVI values ranged from 0.68 to 0.94, and the S‐CVI/Ave was 0.78, below the prespecified reference threshold of 0.90. These findings provide preliminary evidence regarding the relevance, clarity, and perceived bedside applicability of the framework components, but do not establish scale‐level content validity. Conclusion The framework is an evidence‐informed cognitive aid, not a validated clinical decision rule. Further iterative expert consensus and prospective usability, feasibility, and implementation testing are required before broad application. Implications for Nursing Management Nurse managers and health‐system leaders should prioritize structured AI‐literacy education, clear governance, and escalation pathways for AI‐supported recommendations, nurse involvement in AI procurement and implementation, and monitoring mechanisms for AI‐related safety events to ensure safe AI integration into nursing practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jan 2026

Digital Innovations in Nursing Workforce Management: A Scoping Review of Advanced Applications and Implementation Challenges

Current evidence suggests that AI has considerable potential to support nursing workforce management; however, empirical evidence regarding implementation effectiveness remains limited.

R. Rezapour-Nasrabad, Sina Nasrollahi-Nasrabad · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Strategies for Addressing Implementation Challenges.

AI integration in nursing care may be supported by coordinated, ethically grounded, and context-sensitive strategies, and the proposed domains require further empirical evaluation across nursing settings.

D. Alrazeeni, Maryam Alharrasi, M. K. K. Rony et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Nursing Practice: Applications, Benefits, and Challenges — A Systematic Review

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly embedded in nursing workflows, promising earlier detection of patient deterioration, more efficient documentation, and more consistent risk stratification, yet the evidence base is fragmented across clinical domains and ethical...

I. M, Bamigboye T. O., Oniyide A. A. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Nurses’ Experiences With Artificial Intelligence and the Association Between Clinical Decision‐Making and Missed Nursing Care: A Convergent Mixed‐Methods Study

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being incorporated into clinical nursing practice, but evidence remains limited on how nurses experience AI‐supported systems and how decision‐making orientation relates to missed nursing care (MNC). Aim To explore nurses’ experiences with AI‐supported clinical...

F. Alanazi, Ahmed Farghaly Tawfik, S. Mahgoub et al. · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Oct 2026

A tripartite framework for nursing artificial intelligence ethics: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly integrates into nursing practice, education, and research, it presents a profound ethical paradox: significant opportunities for operational efficiency alongside deep-seated challenges to the profession's core values. PURPOSE This scoping review synthesizes existing...

J. Marquard, Suzanne Fink, Winnie Yip et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Factors Influencing Clinical Reasoning Among Clinical Nurses: An Integrative Review Using the Decision‐Making Ecology Model

Background Clinical reasoning (CR) is a complex, context‐dependent process that is essential for safe nursing care. Existing reviews have primarily focused on nursing students rather than practicing clinical nurses. Rapid changes in patient acuity and the increasing integration of digital technologies into healthcare h...

Ju-Hee Lee, Deokhyun Lee, Hyeran Park · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.