Skip to content
Review Open access

‘Weaving of perspectives’: lessons from co-production within an international mental-health science collaboration

Sep 2026 · BMJ mental health · Vol 29 · 1 citation · 20 references
Medicine

TL;DR

GALENOS shows that co-production is not a fixed method but an evolving relational practice requiring practical infrastructures for accessibility, accountability, continuity and ethical care.

Abstract

Abstract Co-production is increasingly recognised as central to improving the quality, relevance and ethical integrity of mental health science, yet evidence is still needed on how lived experience involvement can be meaningfully embedded and sustained in complex research settings. Global Alliance for Living Evidence on Anxiety, Depression and Psychosis (GALENOS) is a Wellcome-funded collaboration conducting living systematic reviews and evidence triangulation, with people with lived experience contributing as Experiential Advisors and through a Global Lived Experience Advisory Board. This perspective uses GALENOS as a case example to reflect on what meaningful co-production practically requires especially in the context of large-scale, technical and international collaborations. It draws on a collective reflection designed and led by people with lived experience, developed through workshops and written contributions involving lived experience contributors, researchers and project-support staff. Discussions were organised around lived experience involvement, capacity development, diversity and representation and influence in strategic decision-making. Across these areas, contributors identified that experiential knowledge needs to become consequential, participation must be supported through care and flexibility, diversity must shape interpretation rather than representation alone and influence must be embedded in governance and decision-making. GALENOS shows that co-production is not a fixed method but an evolving relational practice requiring practical infrastructures for accessibility, accountability, continuity and ethical care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Unpacking the Impact and Experience of Working With Lived Experience Partners in Mental Health Research—Exploring Research Team and Public Partner Perspectives

ABSTRACT Introduction Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in mental health research is encouraged by funders in the United Kingdom, supported by guidance and best practice standards. This includes a commitment to learning and understanding impact. This paper explores the experiences of individuals who worked together...

Joanna Fox, Roya Kamvar, V. Pinfold et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Developing Best Practices in Co‐Production With Lived Experience Experts in Bipolar Research: Insights From the AMBIENT‐BD Lived Experience Advisory Panel

ABSTRACT Introduction Co‐production is becoming an established methodology in mental health research, yet there remains a lack of condition‐specific frameworks to guide its design and implementation. For bipolar disorder in particular, there is limited evidence on how to meaningfully engage lived experience experts in...

Raahat Manrai, A. Roguski, Amy C. Ferguson et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

A Lived Experience Perspective on Digital Regulatory Practices.

The paper reflects on a Wellcome-funded project led by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in collaboration with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Initiated in 2023, the project aimed at developing guidance and regulatory frameworks for digital mental health techno...

Holly Coole, Grace Gatera, Ellen Thomas · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Enabling responsible industry-academic collaboration in mental health research and the involvement of people with lived experience.

There is an urgent need for more effective and better-tolerated treatments for mental illness. Achieving this requires responsible collaboration between academia, healthcare professionals, industry and people with lived experience. However, regulatory and compliance frameworks can make early-stage, non-promotional coll...

Andrew M. McIntosh, Michael McTernan, S. Rae et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Co-design rationales as living documents for reporting the exchange of experiential, professional and scientific perspectives in mental health care innovation

This essay identifies lessons related to epistemic pluralism, dissensus, serendipity, contextual constraints, participatory approaches, paradigmatic differences, and power relations, and develops an architecture that is operationalized through a co-design rationale canvas, enabling the iterative documentation of both t...

Lars Veldmeijer, B. Wartena, G. Terlouw · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Best practices for engaging lived experience experts in dialogues about climate change and mental health: lessons learned from a global effort

The Connecting Climate Minds global initiative sought to advance research and action at the intersection of climate change and mental health by centering the voices of people with lived experience. Through a series of regional and thematic dialogues, Connecting Climate Minds engaged nearly 1,200 participants across sev...

Britt Wray, Ans Vercammen, Lian Zeitz et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.