Skip to content

RankShift: In-Database Detection and Explanation of Categorical Shifts

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

RankShift detects rare-category shifts that are invisible to event-count monitoring, reaching 0.787 AUROC compared with 0.771 for the autoencoder.

Abstract

A login service can receive its usual number of failed sign-ins while one source grows from 2% to 30% of them. The same pattern appears in system logs when a rare event template becomes common while the message rate stays stable. These events change which categories are active without changing how many events occur. RankShift detects such changes inside the analytical database that stores the data. It compares each window's category shares with a benign reference using a Pearson score whose terms identify the categories responsible for the change. The same query returns the score, calibrated alert, and largest increasing contributions. We evaluate RankShift on HDFS, BGL, and Thunderbird. It matches the count-vector autoencoder within 0.001 AUROC on HDFS (0.999 versus 1.000) and leads on Thunderbird (0.983 versus 0.949). In a controlled fixed-volume experiment, RankShift detects rare-category shifts that are invisible to event-count monitoring, reaching 0.787 AUROC compared with 0.771 for the autoencoder. Across all three corpora, observed false-alarm rates track the requested operating levels. RankShift requires no model training or inference service, and the autoencoders deployed state is 137x larger.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Measuring Brand and Source Discovery under Repeated LLM Queries: A Finite-Sample Audit

Repeated-query audits must distinguish recovery of a collected set from completeness of possible outputs. We apply sample-based rarefaction to 4,500 responses from 50 buying questions, six configurations and 15 calls per cell. Historical-dictionary median ten-call recovery of the observed 15-call set ranges from 92.6%...

Dmitrij Żatuchin · 0 citations
#edge computing Preprint Aug 2026

Beat the Counter First: A Baseline for Temporal-Graph Anomaly Detectors

SimpleCount is proposed, a reference with no parameter fitting that selects one scalar feature per dataset from a fixed pool of counts, recencies, first-occurrence indicators, and count-derived transforms that matches or exceeds SLADE on three of six datasets and exceeds IsoForest on all six.

Omair Shafi Ahmed, Zohair Shafi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Witnesses Explain Anomalies

WAND is an unsupervised tabular anomaly detector that is explainable by design, and attains the best mean Friedman rank at ROC-AUC parity with 16 unsupervised baselines, so the gain is interpretability at no accuracy cost.

Lamine Diop · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Endpoint Scores: Time- and Capacity-Conditioned Evaluation of Continual Knowledge Updating

Results show that method ranking in continual updating can depend jointly on when performance is measured and how much replay-side adaptation capacity the baseline receives, and propose reporting trajectories and capacity sweeps, and declaring a robust winner only when the ordering is stable across the evaluation regio...

Heejin Choi · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

TAILOR: Template-Preserving Augmentation for Long-Tailed Log Parsing

TAILOR, a log parsing framework that improves template inference for rare log groups through template-preserving augmentation, is proposed and experimental results show that TAILOR improves parsing accuracy on rare log groups by 19% over the strongest baseline while maintaining competitive performance on complete datas...

Sepideh Hodaeian, Zhen-Hao Li, An-Ran Chen · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Selection Rule Decides the Winner: A Pre-Registered Audit of Open-Set Graph Anomaly Detection

This study re-run two recent methods, DEMO and NSReg, together with OUTPOST, a small first-order detector built for this study, and finds that a 0.002 tie band for hyperparameter selection lies below the paired standard error on all six graphs tested, even at ten seeds.

Farhana Hossain, Taufikur Rahman Fuad, Md Abrar Jahin et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.