An externally anchored leading-order effective field linking empirical dynamics, an interpretable mechanism and neural computation is identified linking empirical dynamics, an interpretable mechanism and neural computation in closed-loop human-AI systems.
Abstract
Closed-loop human-AI systems generate high-dimensional behavioural trajectories whose collective dynamics remain obscure. Using 297,915 learners'adaptive-tutoring histories, we define semantic order variables before model fitting and test them in user-disjoint cohorts. The state exhibits reproducible basin-like flow and operationally defined, state-heterogeneous metastable-like kinetics. A construction-matched null distinguishes normalised-memory relaxation from a reproducible excess field. A four-term conditional mechanism recovers population drift (r = 0.946; learner-bootstrap 95% CI, 0.935-0.955). Predictive event-level self-supervised learning recovers the state and learned-plane flow; null-referenced corrections retain directional, partial-amplitude excess-field structure without full calibration. Shuffled-order training reverses learned-plane flow on ordered trajectories; support-alignment randomisation selectively reduces inward transport. Both axes remain linearly accessible without state supervision. Without cross-model fitting, the models share leading population drift (r = 0.866; learner-bootstrap 95% CI, 0.857-0.875) and persistence ordering; residual directions remain model-specific. These results identify an externally anchored leading-order effective field linking empirical dynamics, an interpretable mechanism and neural computation.
PRISM-M, a simple recurrent mathematical implementation of the Principle of Representation Integration for Stable Models, treats extraction, compression, integration, stabilization, and prediction/action as five interacting operations and tests whether they can produce internal states that persist over time while remai...
Together, these results make intrinsic-extrinsic coupling operational by connecting executable state geometry to continuation-conditioned value, matched interaction identification, and closed-loop coordination, while separating identified coupling from complete-policy performance.
Foundation models for human brain recordings are usually evaluated by signal reconstruction, future-state prediction, and transfer to downstream tasks. However, these benchmarks do not establish whether a transferred model remains valid when the system is actively perturbed. We define perturbational validity as the pre...
José C. Garcí Alanis, S. Alizadeh, M. Rothermel et al.· 0 citations
Dynamical Systems Reconstruction (DSR) aims to infer models from observed time series that reproduce a system's qualitative long-term behavior. Continual DSR (cDSR) requires learning new systems while preserving previously learned dynamics, yet even small parameter updates in recurrent models can qualitatively alter th...
Sima Hashemi, D. Durstewitz, G. Koppe· 0 citations
Repeated decisions exhibit temporal structures such as persistence, direction-dependent switching, recurrent alternation, and abrupt transitions. We examine the generative sufficiency of a two-dimensional fast-slow dynamical system. The system combines a cubic fast equation with linear slow feedback and is analyzed thr...
Results show that compact intervention structure can persist as a moving, state-dependent local geometry embedded in high-dimensional recurrent dynamics, without implying a fixed or dynamically closed low-dimensional state.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.