Skip to content

Singular Curvature in ReLU Training:Differentiation and the Gradient-Flow Limit Need Not Commute

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Gradient descent (GD) is explicit Euler for gradient flow, but a state-accurate continuous-time surrogate need not remain accurate after differentiation. At every fixed nonresonant step size, ordinary automatic differentiation exactly differentiates the executed hard-ReLU GD program. We prove that, over a fixed finite horizon, the GD states converge and these exact discrete derivatives approach an event-free regional propagator, whereas the derivative of the limiting flow also contains speed-normalized activation-event transfers. A prepoint Stieltjes representation separates the absolutely continuous regional Hessian from atomic interface curvature; one nonzero gradient jump produces an exactly rank-one endpoint discrepancy, and global convexity prevents complete multi-event cancellation whenever an event is strict. Nevertheless, a standard family of globally 1-strongly convex residual-ReLU squared-loss risks realizes arbitrarily large reciprocal sensitivity ratios on open initialization sets, with a uniform transversality margin. The same discrete-versus-flow decomposition extends to parameters and reverse-mode adjoints; resolved smoothing in the scalar or autonomous-normal regime and consistent event localization recover the flow sensitivity. The results concern deterministic full-batch, finite-horizon dynamics with a stable finite itinerary of separated same-direction transverse events; they are consistency theorems, not prevalence claims for large-scale training.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Same Loss, Different Gradients

Differentiable learning typically assumes that the scalar objective evaluated in the forward pass and the gradient supplied to the optimizer in the backward pass describe the same mathematical object. We show that this correspondence can fail when probabilistic objectives rely on finite special-function recurrences, cu...

Ning-Kang Peng, Xiao-Qian Peng, Yi-Fan He et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Prediction Limits and Koopman Closure of Geometry-Induced Soft State Abstractions

We study when geometry-induced soft state abstractions admit accurate finite-dimensional linear dynamics. Each state is represented by simplex-valued coordinates obtained from class-specific Kernel Affine Hull Machine (KAHM) reconstruction scores, and a matrix is used to predict the next-state coordinates. Our main res...

Mohit Kumar, S. Kargaran · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Tamed Subgradient Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm beyond Convexity

We study the problem of sampling from target distributions whose potentials are simultaneously non-smooth, subject to superlinear gradient growth, and non-convex. We introduce the Subgradient Tamed Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (SG-TULA), a discretisation of the Langevin diffusion that operates directly on subgradients...

Iosif Lytras, Nikolaos Makras, S. Sabanis · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Critical initialization destabilizes higher input derivatives in wide scalar-input networks

It is proved that every fixed finite derivative order has uniformly bounded variance under explicit regularity assumptions, and for residual networks with branch scale L^{-1/2}, it is proved that every fixed finite derivative order has uniformly bounded variance under explicit regularity assumptions.

Prashant Singh, Pranav Singh · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.