Skip to content

Normalized Low-Rank Adaptation

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 76 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Normalized Low-Rank Adaptation (NoRA) is introduced, a simple yet effective method that normalizes the down-projection matrices during training, improving standard LoRA without requiring repeated normalization throughout training.

Abstract

While low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is widely used for parameter-efficient model adaptation, how to regularize its training dynamics for stable and effective optimization remains underexplored. Because LoRA initializes the up-projection to zero, its early optimization dynamics are largely governed by the down-projection. Building on this observation, we introduce Normalized Low-Rank Adaptation (NoRA), a simple yet effective method that normalizes the down-projection matrices during training. We further show that the same normalization can be applied only at initialization, improving standard LoRA without requiring repeated normalization throughout training. Across pretraining, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning, NoRA consistently accelerates convergence, improves performance and training stability, and mitigates catastrophic forgetting. These benefits require neither additional trainable parameters nor inference-time computation, making NoRA a simple and broadly applicable enhancement to LoRA.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

TaRA: Training-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation Initialization

Training-aware Low-Rank Adaptation Initialization (TaRA) is proposed, a method that initializes LoRA such that the gradients induced by the low-rank factors closely approximate the gradient of the corresponding full-rank weight matrix.

Taehyeon Kim, Eunhyeok Park · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Learn the Directions, Normalize the Gains: Post-Training Normalization for LoRA

While Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enables efficient task specialization, its learned updates can compromise capabilities beyond the target task. We identify \textbf{adaptation imbalance}: a few singular directions dominate the trained update, leaving its performance sensitive to how gains are allocated. We argue that \t...

Zai-Long Tian, Yan-Zhe Chen, Zhuo-Heng Han et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

MuLoRA: Spectrally Balanced Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learning

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) provides a parameter-efficient approach to continual learning, but its nominal rank can conceal a loss of effective adaptation capacity. We identify \emph{spectral plasticity collapse}: during sequential adaptation, update energy becomes concentrated in a small subset of singular modes, leavi...

Jun-Kang Liu · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Efficient sparse low-rank adaptation for large language models.

This paper investigates SoRA algorithm's performance in large-scale models, and derives an improved learning rate configuration and proposes SoRA+, an enhanced variant that introduces a hyperparameter to adjust learning rates proportionally and mitigates the suboptimality of the original SoRA method.

Jun-Ren Qiao, Shi-Song Wu, Wen-Qing Su · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Stabilizing the Dynamic Low-Rank Training

The gradient flow of the best rank-$r$ approximation is derived and it is pointed out that the offset of DLRT comes from a curvature-coupling term which is large and thus non-negligible under aggressive compression, and a stable dynamic low-rank training method is proposed, named SDLRT.

Zhong-Han Xu, Ling Wang, Jun-Hao Chen et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

SeMi-LoRA: Enhancing Low-Rank Adaptation via Separation and Mixing

This work proposes SeMi-LoRA (Separation and Mixing LoRA), a novel framework that enables complete high-rank updates while preserving mergeability and consistently outperforms strong PEFT baselines with favorable parameter efficiency.

Zhen-Fei Yang, Beiming Yu, Peiqin Lin et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.