Skip to content

Bridging deterministic and stochastic scheduling: Learning risk-aware forecast adjustments for PV-BESS operation

Oct 2026 · Applied Energy · 23 references
Electric Power System Optimization

Abstract

The participation of hybrid photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage system (BESS) installations in electricity markets requires modeling multi-temporal forecast uncertainty via temporal trajectories and integrating this information into bidding optimization frameworks. Most state-of-the-art approaches rely on stochastic or robust optimization methods, which are computationally intensive and offer limited interpretability to decision-makers. Consequently, deterministic optimization approaches remain the industry standard in practical market applications. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a novel learning-to-optimize framework that combines a deterministic mixed-integer linear programming formulation with a context-aware artificial neural network policy trained through reinforcement learning. The policy operates as a learned cost function approximation , translating probabilistic forecast metrics into time-dependent multiplicative forecast adjustment parameters. This approach preserves the simplicity and industry acceptance of deterministic optimization while effectively embedding information related to forecast uncertainty and risk-awareness into the day-ahead bidding and scheduling process for hybrid PV-BESS systems. For a real-world electric vehicle charging station case study in Portugal, equipped with 375 kWp of PV generation and a 1.258 MWh BESS, the proposed learning-to-optimize framework substantially outperforms the deterministic baseline. Specifically, it captures 39.27% and 27.26% of the maximum theoretical cost-saving potential achievable under perfect forecasts during autumn and summer peak periods, respectively. At the intraday level, the learned policy effectively mitigates systematic forecast errors, reducing the cumulative daily negative imbalance volume by 48.22% under standard operating conditions. Moreover, the framework maintains a robust operational safety margin, reducing imbalance exposure by 10.02% during large unforeseen PV generation drops caused by clouds.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.