Skip to content
#data science Dataset Open access

农科(蔬菜学·茶学)学术英语语料库 v1.2 · 语料数据包(受限访问) / Agricultural English Corpus v1.2 (Horticulture & Tea Science) · Data Package (Restricted Access)

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

本记录为该语料库 v1.2 的语料数据包(受限访问)。 内容:主数据四表(文献主表/句对表/摘要表/句级全量表)、语步标注表、派生语料视图(双语总表、研究论文子集、英文语料与学科对照、平衡对照子库、结构化摘要分层清单)、特色库(辣椒遗传育种、茶叶深加工)篇目与作者索引,以及 4 个期刊采集脚本(含站点请求结构,仅随受限件提供)。不含 CNKI 导出件。 规模(v1.2):中文双语语料 2,765 篇、文献主表 4,604 条、中英句对 13,028 对、英文单语 1,783 篇、中文单语 56 篇;句级表 53,303 行(中文 13,369+英文 39,934);语步标注 53,303 行、覆盖率 99.9%。 访问与许可:语料文本的著作权属原期刊与作者,仅限学术研究按需申请获取。Restricted access: the abstracts are the copyright of the original journals/authors. The files are shared for academic research upon request only. 本版(v1.2)修订——自 v1.0.3 起累计两批改动,均在此如实披露: 一、v1.1(语料层,本版一并发布) ① 剔除 EN-1601(Horticulture Research 2023,DOI 10.1093/hr/uhad149):该篇源件的 abstract 字段实为整篇通信(Letter)正文 10,629 字符(开头 Dear Editor,无 Abstract 段),按本库"语料单元=摘要"的口径整篇剔除并留档;全库复扫此类声明块标记仅此 1 篇。⇒ 文献主表 4,605→4,604、摘要表 7,370→7,369、英文单语 1,784→1,783、英文句数 40,016→39,935;中英句对 13,028 不变。② 正式并入"句级全量表"(一个句子一行、覆盖全部摘要):53,304 行(中文 13,369+英文 39,935)。句级统计一律以它为分母;句对表是"配对视图"(只收配对得上的句子),不等于全库句数。 二、v1.2(本版新增) ① 修复 CN-1280 的"中英摘要粘连"(《中国蔬菜》2025):该篇源件的英文字段实为"中文摘要 432 字+英文摘要 1,477 字"粘连成一行(1,910 字符、汉字占比 0.1272),被当作英文摘要入库,并在句级表里切出一句中文的"英文句序1",使该篇 5 个句对整体错位一格。已剥离为纯英文(1,477 字符,SHA256 前 16 位 604a77c7f4665a96),并以差量核对证明全库只有该篇英文侧变动。⇒ 句级表 53,304→53,303(英文 39,935→39,934)、该篇英文句数 8→7;句对表 13,028 不变、摘要表 7,369 与主表 4,604 不变。② 新增"语步标注表"(立项书"标注库"的语步层):用 SciAIEngine(move_recognition_cn/_en)对全部摘要做全量重跑(中文 2,821 篇+英文 4,547 篇=148 次调用,未沿用任何旧批标注),53,303 行、覆盖率 99.9%;未匹配 61 行(0.11%)留空并列明清单。四级匹配口径(精确→继承(引擎合并)→继承(引擎拆分)/多标签-取最长→近似≥0.6)会造成标签一对多,方法节须披露。 三、本版规模:文献主表 4,604 条/中英句对 13,028 /摘要表 7,369 行/句级表 53,303 行/语步标注 53,303 行。 说明:v1.0.3 与 v1.2 之间的 v1.1 未单独发布到 Zenodo,其改动已并入本版;上一版(v1.0.3)及其之前版本仍可访问,用于追溯修订过程。

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.