Skip to content

Inverting Foundation Models of Brain Function with Simulation-Based Inference

Apr 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2604.23865 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work pairs the brain emulator with large language models that generate news headlines from linguistic parameters such as valence, arousal, and dominance and shows that these parameters can be recovered from predicted brain maps, demonstrating that the emulator's synthetic neural encodings preserve information about the controlled stimulus dimensions.

Abstract

Foundation models of brain activity promise a new frontier for in silico neuroscience by emulating neural responses to complex stimuli across tasks and modalities. A natural next step is to ask whether these models can also be used in reverse. Can we recover a stimulus or its properties from synthetic brain activity? We study this question in a proof-of-concept setting using TRIBEv2. We pair the brain emulator with large language models (LLMs) that generate news headlines from linguistic parameters such as valence, arousal, and dominance. We then use simulation-based inference to learn a probabilistic mapping from brain maps to latent stimulus parameters. Our results show that these parameters can be recovered from predicted brain maps, demonstrating that the emulator's synthetic neural encodings preserve information about the controlled stimulus dimensions. They also show that LLMs can serve as controllable stimulus generators for simulated experiments. Together, these findings provide a step toward decoding and inverse design with foundation brain models.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Making models disagree to learn how brains compute

Computational hypotheses about brain information processing can be expressed in neural network models. Neuroscientists have begun to compare such models in terms of their alignment with neural and behavioural data. The high parametric capacity of these models is essential to their ability to capture cognitive processes...

Tal Golan, H. Schütt, N. Kriegeskorte · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Predictor Construction Can Reverse Multimodal Neural Contrasts

These results show that nested neural contrasts do not identify represented content by themselves: predictor construction is part of the experimental design, and matched controls are required for representational claims.

Lucas Nadolskis, Galen Pogoncheff, Michael Beyeler · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

A Roadmap for MEG Foundation Models

This perspective lays down the basic concepts needed to understand MEG foundation models and provides a didactic overview of the field's key design choices, including tokenization, sensor- versus source-space representations, sensor-geometry encoding, backbone architectures, self-supervised objectives, and pretraining...

Philipp Thölke, Hamza Abdelhedi, Yorguin-José Mantilla-Ramos et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Sparks of In Silico Cognitive Science: Theories from Simulated Data Can Generalize to Humans

The Automated Cognitive Scientist, a closed-loop discovery system in which LLM agents design theory-discriminating experiments, collect responses, arbitrate between competing theories, and synthesize successors, entirely on behavior simulated by Centaur, a foundation model of human behavior, succeeds despite the simula...

A. K. Jagadish, Younes Strittmatter, Nori Jacoby et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Logical subspace in LLMs

The minimal viable subspace (MVS) method, which searches for the lowest-rank activation subspace at a layer that preserves task performance when everything outside that subspace is ablated, suggests a functionally localizable core machinery for logic akin to that in the human brain.

Hope H. Kean, Enric Boix-Adserà · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.