This work model this competition as a zero-sum robotaxi assignment game, focusing on computing optimal deterministic Stackelberg strategies for the leader, and provides an exact polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm for computing the optimal Stackelberg payoff when riders and vehicles are on the Euclidean line.
Abstract
In autonomous mobility duopolies, platforms compete for riders based on vehicle proximity. A critical operational challenge---faced by an incumbent proactively defending against a market entrant---is how to dispatch fleets to minimize demand poached by a reactive competitor. We model this competition as a zero-sum robotaxi assignment game, focusing on computing optimal deterministic Stackelberg strategies for the leader. We formulate this problem as an exact single-level integer linear program and use its relaxation to design a polynomial-time approximation algorithm achieving an additive error from the optimum. We argue that this is not far from best possible by proving that deciding whether a strictly positive payoff is achievable is NP-complete, and that approximating the optimal payoff within an additive error scaling linearly with the number of riders is NP-hard. We also provide an exact polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm for computing the optimal Stackelberg payoff when riders and vehicles are on the Euclidean line. Finally, we complement our theoretical findings with an empirical evaluation using real-world ride-hailing data. The experiments demonstrate that our LP-based algorithm significantly outperforms its worst-case guarantee in practice, while lightweight heuristics achieve highly competitive payoffs with negligible computational overhead, offering practical solutions for large-scale deployments.
Aviation authorities worldwide expect Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) traffic management to be decentralized among service providers, requiring AAM flights to autonomously plan trajectories by predicting other flights'control inputs rather than relying on centralized coordination. Game-theoretic approaches that formulate m...
Victor L. Qin, Nicolas Lanzetti, Saverio Bolognani et al.· 0 citations
The classic Stackelberg model (CSM) generally yields fractional units given its continuous divisibility assumption. We consider whether the first-mover in a duopoly game is hurt by rounding budgetary estimates of quantity as calculated from the CSM. We derive our benchmark for not rounding by considering a dynamic “gam...
Y. Davis, J. Kerstein· International Game Theory Re...· 0 citations
We introduce cooperative integer programming games (CIPGs), in which agents pool budget constraints to accomplish indivisible tasks jointly and the characteristic function maps every coalition to the optimal value of a pooled integer program. Our goal is to identify an optimal coalition structure (OCS) and a stable one...
Hyunwoo Lee, R. Hildebrand, I. E. Buyuktahtakin· 0 citations
Defending high-value assets against precision-guided missiles is among the hardest problems in modern autonomous systems, and cooperative swarms of low-cost unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly changing how this defense can be mounted. We study such a swarm tasked with deploying smoke screen countermeasures, for...
In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer of a hierarchical controller. Such interactions are routinely replaced by a potential game, i.e.\ by a common objective, f...
Zhi-Hao Lin, Jiang-Lin Lan, Anh-Tu Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
In long-range sequential orbital pursuit-evasion game scenarios, traditional Nash equilibrium algorithms rely on symmetric simultaneous decision-making assumptions. Such algorithms fail to fully exploit the sequential advantages of the leader-follower paradigm in practical space missions, and often yield conservative s...
Hao Liang, Zheng Xue, Jin Jiang et al.· Aerospace· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.