Oct 2026· International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies· Vol 5, pp. 291-303· 0 citations
TL;DR
The results show that the adoption of AI depends primarily on technological maturity, data quality, auditors’ skills, organisational support, governance and trust in the systems and the main challenges relate to governance, explainability, reliability, skills, human oversight and data protection.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence into internal audit is progressing rapidly, driven by developments in machine learning, predictive analytics, natural language processing and, more recently, generative artificial intelligence. This study aims to systematically analyse the determinants of AI adoption in internal audit; its main uses and the challenges associated with its integration. A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, using the Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering the period 2015–2026. Following identification, deduplication, screening and eligibility assessment, 35 studies were selected for analysis. The results show that the adoption of AI depends primarily on technological maturity, data quality, auditors’ skills, organisational support, governance and trust in the systems. Its main applications relate to risk assessment, anomaly detection, task automation, continuous auditing, document analysis and decision support. The main challenges relate to governance, explainability, reliability, skills, human oversight and data protection. The review highlights the multidimensional nature of AI adoption and emphasises the importance of aligning technologies, human capabilities and governance mechanisms to ensure controlled integration within the internal audit function.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Internal audit; Technology adoption; Generative artificial intelligence; Systematic review.
Received Date: August 17, 2026
Accepted Date: September 09, 2026
Published Date: October 01, 2026
Available Online at: https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/975
Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, document intelligence, generative AI and advanced analytics, is reshaping the way audit teams identify risk, analyse transactions and evaluate evidence. Yet greater analytical capacity does not automatically produce higher audit quality. AI outputs may be incomp...
Maria Selvi, S. Sujeet, Andrew Kurian Paul et al.· Scholar Journal of Humanitie...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly contributing to beneficial transformations in auditing by
enhancing analytical capabilities, automating monotonous tasks, and refining decision-making processes.
This piece of research looks into the effects of predictive and generative AI on the quality of auditing as
well...
S. Christopher, J. Antony, Zaheda Daruwala et al.· Archives for Technical Scien...· 0 citations
This systematic literature review explores the interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and human capital in shaping future audit quality. Using the PRISMA framework, 33 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Web of Science (2021–2025) were analysed to assess how AI capabilities and human expertise jointly influe...
Sangita Jeyaram, Dewi Fariha Abdullah· Advanced International Journ...· 0 citations
Purpose– This study examines how artificial intelligence and auditors' professional attributes, competence, independence, and ethics, are associated with perceived audit quality among external auditors in public accounting firms in Jakarta and Bogor, Indonesia.Methods – Data were collected from 109 external auditors vi...
Tryas Chasbiandani, A. Juwita, Ririen Eka Dinyati et al.· Indonesian Journal of Taxati...· 0 citations
A systematic review of the literature on methodologies, frameworks, and techniques for auditing AI systems, focusing on legal and ethical considerations and compliance with regulations, reveals gaps in current auditing practices and highlights the importance of incorporating AI value chain stages and AI maturity levels...
Usman Shahbaz, A. Beheshti, B. Abedin et al.· ACM Computing Surveys· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.