Skip to content
Open access

COMPARISON AND TUNING OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR COLUMN WEB PANEL IN TRANSVERSE COMPRESSION

Sep 2026 · ASES CONGRESS 2026 · pp. 448-457 · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

A machine learning-based approach for resistance prediction of the column web panel in transverse compression, based on a numerical dataset generated using IDEA StatiCa Connection, and three machine learning models are investigated and compared.

Abstract

<p>The component method enables efficient design of steel joints by decomposing them into individual components characterized by their resistance and stiffness. This paper presents a machine learning-based approach for resistance prediction of the column web panel in transverse compression, based on a numerical dataset generated using IDEA StatiCa Connection. Three machine learning models are investigated and compared: a deep neural network, Random Forest, and XGBoost. Particular attention is given to the influence of model tuning on predictive performance, where the deep neural network is tuned using a manual sensitivity-based procedure, while Random Forest and XGBoost are tuned using grid search. The results highlight differences in model behavior, sensitivity to tuning, and overall prediction accuracy. The study emphasizes the importance of appropriate model selection and tuning when applying machine learning models to resistance prediction problems in steel joint design.</p>

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Machine Learning for Column Web Panel in Transverse Compression Component

The component method enables efficient design of diverse steel joints by decomposing the joint into individual components characterized by their load resistance and initial stiffness. Machine Learning (ML) models exceed code‐based formulas in predictive accuracy; however, their limited interpretability raises concern a...

Amina Hajdarević, Martin Vild, Andreas A. Müller et al. · 1 citation
Open access Jan 2026

Comparison Between Machine Learning Predictions and Eurocode 8 Empirical Expressions for the Plastic Rotation Capacity of Rectangular Rc Columns

Abstract This paper presents a comparative assessment of the plastic rotation capacity of rectangular reinforced concrete columns, using machine learning predictions and the empirical expressions provided by Eurocode 8, Part 3. The study relies on a database of 258 rectangular RC column specimens subjected to quasi-sta...

Andrei-Odey Kadhim, Iolanda Craifaleanu · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Machine learning–assisted performance prediction of carbon fiber Mortise-Tenon connections in civil structures

This study confirms the effectiveness of machine learning in rapid performance prediction and key parameter identification for carbon fiber mortise-tenon structures, providing a new approach for the intelligent design of composite material connections.

Yu-Hang Qin, Yu-Jian Han, Chao Xiong et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Transfer learning for the assessment of bolted steel joints employing mechanical models and ANNs

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are efficient surrogate models; however, their application in structural engineering is often limited by the high computational cost required to generate sufficiently large training datasets from nonlinear FE analyses. This paper proposes a framework that combines transfer learning, an...

Adriano Silva Carvalho, F. Ljubinković, T. Bogdan et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Comparative study of predictive models for the ultimate tensile strength of FDM-printed PLA parts based on literature-integrated data

Fused deposition modeling is an important additive manufacturing technology, and accurate prediction of the mechanical properties of three-dimensional-printed parts is essential for engineering applications. However, existing studies are often limited by small sample sizes, insufficient comparison of predictive met...

Jie Chen, Yu-Bin Fang, Zi-Hao Liu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.