Skip to content

WorldCupArena: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Language Models and Deep-Research Agents on Football Forecasting

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.18084 · 1 citation · ⚡ 1 influential · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

WorldCupArena is presented, a dynamic benchmark for language models and deep-research agents that can be reused for future leagues and cups, and shows only small gains in result and exact-score accuracy, but a clearer gain in Scoreline.

Abstract

Predicting a football match before kickoff requires more than knowing past results: a model must use changing information and make a clear prediction before the answer is available. We present WorldCupArena, a dynamic benchmark for language models and deep-research agents. The 2026 FIFA World Cup is its first evaluation, and the same process can be reused for future leagues and cups. Before each match, a model either receives a common evidence package or searches for information itself. It predicts the result and score, likely players and events, match statistics, and the outcome of the competition. After the match, these predictions are compared with the recorded result. We report result accuracy, exact-score accuracy, and a scoreline score that gives some credit when a predicted score is close but not exact, together with scores for the other prediction tasks. Across systems, similar result accuracy can mask larger differences in detailed predictions. Four systems predicted champion Spain, and two of them also recovered the exact final pairing. Compared with betting-market and human-fan baselines, the best system shows only small gains in result and exact-score accuracy, but a clearer gain in Scoreline. New schedules can be added as they begin, allowing the benchmark to evaluate future models without using outcomes that are already known. Code, predictions and evaluation scripts will be publicly released.

View source

Similar papers

#large language models Open access Sep 2026

Forecasting the FIFA World Cup 2026 with Large Language Models: A Benchmark of Reasoning, Web-Augmented, Agentic, and Open-Weight AI Systems

It is suggested that reasoning alone is not sufficient for tournament forecasting when the task depends on current squads, recent performance, injuries, rankings, and evolving football context, and this study provides a reproducible evaluation framework for large language model-based sports forecasting.

Ádám Hartvég, Domonkos Dékány, Barbara Simon et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Mitigating Sycophancy and Alignment Failures in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) that have been fine-tuned using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are likely to conform to the user, even when the user is wrong. This is one of the more intransigent side effects of current alignment methods and is called sycophancy. This review traces the origin of sycopha...

Venkata Phanindra Gollapalli, Sai M. Dasari, Shailesh Kadam et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Self-Play Search Distillation for Large Language Model Reasoning

Self-Play Search Distillation (SPSD), a framework for generating superhuman synthetic data via self-play of MuZero-like networks trained on board games, offers an annotation-efficient way to create high-quality synthetic data for improving LLM performance in reasoning tasks.

Lorenzo Molfetta, Wai-Chung Kwan, Giacomo Frisoni et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Can Language Models Learn to Forecast Stock Prices

Results show that post-training can substantially improve financial forecasting performance, together with changes in how the model investigates the market, on this outcome-selected benchmark.

Jia-Cheng Guo, Suo-Zhi Huang, Shu-Zhen Li et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Does Learning to Predict the World Help Agents Act? Auditing World-Model Post-Training

This work replaces true next-observation targets with in-distribution mismatched observations and introduces a setting that replaces prediction-based rewards with independent random signals, which expands task coverage even when the reward carries no environment information.

Xin-Yu Che, Hang Yan, Yan-Chen Liu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.