MTPaperBananaBench, a benchmark for multi-turn diagram generation containing 292 images annotated with 3,518 user requirements, is presented and PaperBanana-Interact, a multi-agent system that refines diagrams via an internal critique-and-refine loop is introduced.
Abstract
Recent efforts have aimed to automate scientific diagram generation from paper content (Lin et al., 2026; Zhu et al., 2026a). However, fully satisfying an author's visual and communicative preferences in a single turn is challenging: in our formative user study (N = 14), all participants requested further revisions after viewing an initial draft, and 86% of them rated the refined diagrams as more satisfactory. Despite the clear demand, the multi-turn workflow remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we present MTPaperBananaBench, a benchmark for multi-turn diagram generation containing 292 images annotated with 3,518 user requirements. To reduce expensive human studies and enable scalable benchmarking, we construct a user simulator that, at each turn, identifies unsatisfied requirements and converts k of them into natural language feedback. Evaluating both requirement satisfaction and overall diagram quality reveals two key failure modes shared across baseline multiturn systems: (1) quality drift, where diagram quality progressively declines over turns, and (2) forgetting, where previously implemented features are lost in subsequent turns. To address these issues, we introduce PaperBanana-Interact, a multi-agent system that refines diagrams via an internal critique-and-refine loop. PaperBanana-Interact consistently improves rather than degrades diagram quality across turns, outperforming baselines by 11.9-18.6 points in quality score and reducing forgetting by 3.7-6.2 points.
Scientific method diagrams express computations through entities, dependencies, and conditional routes. Although generated figures can be improved through repeated editing, it is less clear whether experience from one paper improves the first figure of another. We present \sys, a framework for source-grounded adaptatio...
Feng Yuan, Yi-Fan Gao, Hao-Yue Li et al.· 0 citations
This work designed a tool called dBlocks with the following features: blocks to scope content, a context manager to edit context, and inline execution to verify code, and shows how human-centered design can guide the development of LLM-integrated tools.
This work introduces PROS (Proactive Refinement Of Scientific Posters), which separates epistemic initiative from behavioral authority: the system can surface source-grounded candidate problems, while users decide which become repair goals and whether resulting changes are committed.
Xingda Lyu, Hong-Ling Lu, Xin-ye Luo et al.· 0 citations
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been growing the capability for scientific writing and collaboration. For example, OpenAI Prism is a free workspace for scientific writing and collaboration. One important feature in Prism is turning scientific diagrams directly into LaTeX TikZ code. In this paper, we build...
Wei-Hao Bo, Shan Zhang, Yanpeng Sun et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
The rapid advancement of Auto-Research has surfaced a fundamental evaluation challenge: how can we measure the alignment, logical coherence, and evolutionary completeness of its research trajectory with human research behavior? We propose Auto-Research's Alignment and Completeness, ARAC-Bench: a Researcher-Mimicking Ev...
Jiale Cui, Yue-Yao Yuan, Kai-Xi Zhong et al.· 0 citations
DraftTrace is introduced, a writing environment that jointly captures three complementary views of writing: the final product, the writing process and interactions with an integrated AI-assistant.
Divyansh Chandarana, S. De, Vivek Gupta· 0 citations
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.