Skip to content

Learning Composable Chains-of-Thought

May 2025 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2505.22635 · 1 citation · 72 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is found that simply training models on CoT data of atomic tasks leads to limited generalization, but minimally modifying CoT formats of constituent atomic tasks to be composable can lead to improvements.

Abstract

A common approach for teaching large language models (LLMs) to reason is to train on chain-of-thought (CoT) traces of in-distribution reasoning problems, but such annotated data is costly to obtain for every problem of interest. We want reasoning models to generalize beyond their training distribution, and ideally to generalize compositionally: combine atomic reasoning skills to solve harder, unseen reasoning tasks. We take a step towards compositional generalization of reasoning skills when addressing a target compositional task that has no labeled CoT data. We find that simply training models on CoT data of atomic tasks leads to limited generalization, but minimally modifying CoT formats of constituent atomic tasks to be composable can lead to improvements. We can train"atomic CoT"models on the atomic tasks with Composable CoT data and combine them with multitask learning or model merging for better zero-shot performance on the target compositional task. Such a combined model can be further bootstrapped on a small amount of compositional data using rejection sampling fine-tuning (RFT). Results on string operations and natural language skill compositions show that training LLMs on Composable CoT outperforms multitask learning and continued fine-tuning baselines within a given training data budget.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Compositional Reasoning in Language Models under Reinforcement Learning Post-Training

A dependency-graph framework is proposed to formalize compositional reasoning, yielding three levels of compositionality with increasing complexity, and preliminary evidence that the decomposed-to-composed asymmetry can extend to practical settings is presented.

Yu He, Ying-Xi Li, Yi-Fei Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis

Vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle with compositional reasoning tasks, but the reasons for this underperformance remain unclear. A common hypothesis is that models struggle to integrate multiple components, leading to training interventions to improve compositional binding. However, this assumption has never...

Mona Gandhi, Cenk Merih Olcay, Kuan-Chieh Lo et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces

Evaluated on two reasoning domains, math and multi-hop reasoning, across 1-8B models from different families, LoT consistently improves over KD and converges faster than staged curricula, highlighting the value of adaptive progression.

Ming-Hui Liu, Thomas Magelinski, De-Hao Yuan et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ChainPrune: Evaluating and Reducing Redundancy in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

This work proposes ChainPrune, a novel reasoning path semantic structural optimization method to efficiently and controllably synthesize self-generated high-quality training data and incorporates a DPO-based preference learning method combined with supervised loss, effectively mitigating false reward suppression.

Wei-Hang Pan, Zhengxu Yu, Yuxiang Zhang et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

TimeThink: Eliciting Compositional Reasoning in Timeseries Large Language Models

TimeThink, a synthetic framework for eliciting compositional timeseries reasoning that employs a reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) training strategy that encourages explicit reasoning, significantly outperforms strong baselines on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Sudarshan Regmi, Arvind Pillai, Y. Wu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Empowering Small Language Models With Chain of Thought and Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning for Efficient Deep Reasoning

A systematic, multi-model framework that combines Chain-of-Thought prompting with Low-Rank Adaptation parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and measures the contribution of each component independently is investigated, making capable SLM-based reasoning deployable without datacenter-scale infrastructure.

Aryan Raina, Shiwani Gupta, Jagruti Jadhav et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.