Skip to content

Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.31556 · 1 citation · 48 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

LALS (Latent Association Leaning Score) is introduced, a zero-shot metric that projects visual-token activations into the model's text-embedding space to measure concept associations per token and layer and shows that culturally loaded visual cues further modulate these internal associations.

Abstract

Alignment teaches vision-language models (VLMs) to avoid expressing demographic biases, and when gender is clearly visible they largely succeed. Far less is known about ambiguous inputs (a worker in full gear, a figure seen from behind), cases common in practice yet rarely studied. We find that minimal prompting pressure exposes occupation-gender defaults when prompting ambiguous input images, with models collapsing to male even for strongly female-stereotyped occupations. But do these outputs reflect what models actually encode internally? We introduce LALS (Latent Association Leaning Score), a zero-shot metric that projects visual-token activations into the model's text-embedding space to measure concept associations per token and layer. Across 15 occupations, over 800 gender-ambiguous images, and four VLMs, internal representations and outputs often become systematically decoupled: models often encode a female association internally yet output male. Layer-wise analysis reveals an asymmetric filter: male signal amplifies end-to-end while female signal peaks mid-network and is suppressed before generation. A color ablation shows that culturally loaded visual cues such as clothing color further modulate these internal associations.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Which Source Wins? Task-Dependent Reliance in Vision-Language Models

Modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, models, and evaluation settings, which shows that modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, and evaluation settings.

Rodela Ghosh, Aviral Gupta, Guang-Jing Wang · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

When Words Speak Louder than Images: Towards Understanding Language Bias in Vision-Language Models

Despite substantial progress across downstream applications, vision-language models (VLMs) remain susceptible to language bias, often prioritizing linguistic cues over visual evidence and consequently producing incorrect predictions. Prior studies have proposed various approaches to understanding and mitigating languag...

Yi-Zhou Fang, Si-Yu Chen, Zi-Mo Qi et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Guardrail-Agnostic Societal Bias Evaluation in Large Vision-Language Models

A societal bias evaluation method for large vision-language models (LVLMs) in the era of strong safety guardrails is proposed, finding that all models undesirably use user demographic information in person-irrelevant tasks.

Yusuke Hirota, Michael Boone, Arun George Zachariah et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Gender Bias in Vision-Language In-Context Learning

In-context learning (ICL) enables large vision-language models (LVLMs) to perform tasks by following patterns from in-context examples, yet its potential to amplify societal biases remains underexplored. We systematically investigate how ICL influences gender bias in LVLMs through VL-BICLE, an evaluation framework comp...

Tong Xiang, Yuta Nakashima, Noa Garcia · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Alignment Illusion in Multimodal Large Language Models

Internal visual-text alignment in MLLMs is best read as a geometric diagnostic of the visual stream inside the language model rather than a direct proxy for content-level cross-modal interaction, and is most informative when calibrated by controlled task evidence.

Hong-Han Wang, Yun-Tao Wang, Hui-Chao Ding · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.