This work bridges the gap between affective computing and technical implementation of autonomous vehicles, grounding UX evaluation in real-world contexts and laying a foundation for user-centered design of autonomous mobility systems and robotics in general.
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) promise safer, cleaner, and more inclusive mobility, yet large-scale adoption is hindered by user acceptance rather than by technical challenges. Prior studies on acceptance and user experience largely rely on surveys, simulators or Wizard-of-Oz setups, often over-representing technologically enthusiastic participants and focusing on drivers instead of passengers. We address this gap with real-world field studies with AVs in real traffic, totaling 144 participants. Using multi-modal sensing, we evaluated EGG, heartbeat, breathing, camera and voice signals for affect inference in combination with vehicle data. Our results show that breathing, camera and voice measurements are reliable and pratical in naturalistic passenger contexts. We further contribute a validated study protocol, a self-assessment app for real-time assessment during human-machine interaction, and a tailored questionnaire to capture participant attitudes towards AVs. By grounding UX evaluation in real-world contexts, this work lays a foundation for user-centered design of autonomous mobility systems and robotics in general. Our work bridges the gap between affective computing and technical implementation of autonomous vehicles.
This paper introduces
Mobility Interaction Sim
, a Unity-based experimental platform for human factors research on shared mobility environments where pedestrians, automated vehicles, micromobility riders, and delivery robots negotiate the same physical space. A single project compiles to two deployment targets: a U...
Kevin Salubre, Hiu-Chun Lo, Akash Kumar et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
Critical themes include, for example, the need for context-specific, deliberate selection of subjective measures; the promise and practical limitations of physiological signals; the ground truth challenge that complicates subjective-objective combination; and the emerging role of artificial intelligence for real-time i...
Chen Peng, P. Bazilinskyy, Yue-Teng Yu et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
The advent of automated vehicles (AVs) prompted AutomotiveUI researchers to investigate how AVs can safely share the road with Human Road Users (HRUs). Researchers developed interfaces to facilitate AV-HRU interaction, e.g., on-vehicle eHMIs. However, these were mostly evaluated through online surveys with stationary p...
Ammar Al-Taie, Ming-Yu Han, Ian Oakley· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
The transition toward highly automated vehicles is primarily driven by safety and efficiency, often overlooking subjective aspects of driving such as enjoyment, emotional engagement, and the pleasure of driving itself. These factors remain central to the mobility experience of drivers. We evaluate a context-sensitive,...
A. Remlinger, Alice Rollwagen, Andreas Riener· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Driving simulators support human factors and automotive user interface research, allowing repeated testing of unsafe or future-oriented scenarios within controlled and low-risk settings. However, researchers often invest additional effort because commercial platforms represent scenarios through vehicle behavior and tim...
Wei-Hsiang Lo, Jin-Cheng Ye, Man-Hua Wang· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
Realistic pedestrian dynamics are essential for enhancing presence and user engagement in immersive virtual environments (IVEs), yet most VR-based crowd research focuses primarily on basic locomotion or isolated pedestrian behaviors. To determine which scene-level and behavioral enrichments truly improve the VR experie...
A. Bönsch, Julian Koska, Konstantin W. Kühlem et al.· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM...· 0 citations
AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.