Aug 2026· European Conference on Knowledge Management· 0 citations· 28 references
TL;DR
A competency-based AI readiness framework is developed that links implementation challenges with readiness requirements and role-specific competencies and develops conceptual propositions that can be examined in future empirical research.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing how organisations create, share, apply and govern knowledge. However, its organisational value does not follow automatically from tool availability. Many GenAI initiatives remain limited to pilots, isolated experiments or local productivity gains because the knowledge resources, competencies and governance routines required for reliable use are not sufficiently defined. This conceptual paper examines how AI readiness and competency models can support knowledge-based GenAI implementation. It asks how recurring implementation challenges can be translated into organisational readiness requirements and then into role-specific competency dimensions. The paper draws on a conceptual synthesis of scholarly literature on AI implementation, AI readiness, AI capability, knowledge management, AI literacy, human-AI collaboration, organisational learning and AI governance. The synthesis is complemented by selected practice-oriented reports and anonymised insights from prior exploratory qualitative research on digital and AI-related competencies. The paper develops a competency-based AI readiness framework that links implementation challenges, including unclear problem definition, weak workflow integration, data quality and availability issues, governance gaps and resistance to change, with strategic, process-related, data-related, governance-related and human capability requirements. Its central argument is that competency models can function as knowledge management instruments. They make implicit GenAI-related knowledge requirements visible and translate them into technical, strategic, communicative and ethical-governance competencies. Existing approaches mainly catalogue organisational readiness factors, capability resources or individual AI literacy skills. The proposed framework goes one step further by linking implementation challenges with readiness requirements and role-specific competencies. In this way, competency models connect AI readiness with capability development, organisational learning, responsible use and sustainable value creation. By focusing on GenAI-supported knowledge work, the paper connects AI readiness and AI capability research with knowledge management. It proposes a framework for operationalising AI readiness through competency models and develops conceptual propositions that can be examined in future empirical research. The framework highlights how systematic competency development can strengthen knowledge flows, human-AI collaboration and the responsible use of GenAI in organisations.
Using a Design Science Research approach, the proposed agentic AI artefact offers a foundation for developing adaptive diagnostic systems that support strategic decision-making process, enhance organizational learning and improve the actionability of AI readiness assessments.
K. Jonak, Andrzej Wodecki· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The findings show that AI-related competency change extends beyond technical skills toward hybrid and portfolio-based configurations that integrate technical understanding, managerial judgment, learning agility, governance capabilities, and psychological readiness, and demonstrates that no single framework sufficiently...
The study contributes to information systems research by reframing AI readiness from a static resource inventory to an evolving organisational capability and offers managers a diagnostic logic for sequencing AI investments and avoiding premature scaling.
K. Jonak, Andrzej Wodecki· Discover Artificial Intellig...· 0 citations
A structured framework for the literature and theory is built, showing how AI capability fuels innovation via interconnected knowledge processes across the organization, putting human judgment, epistemic governance, and knowledge validation at the center of how organizations learn and innovate with AI.
Vaivaw Kumar Singh· International Journal of Lat...· 0 citations
A dual perception is revealed in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands, revealing a dual perception in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands.
M. Nakash, E. Bolisani· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
A process model is developed showing how tacit knowledge generated through micro-level human–AI collaboration is externalized as articulated experiential insights, validated and simplified into shared heuristics, and ultimately codified and embedded in organizational routines to help firms to renew internal knowledge r...
Erica Wen Chen, Hongkun Tang, Ben Nanfeng Luo et al.· Management Decision· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.