Skip to content

Trajectory-Constrained Feature Transformation Optimization Framework for Stable Tabular Data Reprogramming

Oct 2026 · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · 23 references
Machine Learning and Data Classification

Abstract

Tabular data reprogramming is a cornerstone of Data-Centric AI, which seeks to mathematically reconfigure raw features into more expressive and model-efficient representations. This process has traditionally relied on extensive manual engineering. Further, recent automated feature transformation approaches treat each transformation as conditionally independent, preventing the reuse of successful exploration experiences and learning from failures. This myopic view results in redundant evaluations, unstable exploration, and limited generalizability. To address the limitations, we propose the Trajectory-Constrained Transformation Optimization ( TCTO ), a novel data reprogramming framework that reconceptualizes feature transformation as a coordinated planning problem rather than isolated optimization steps. TCTO introduces a cascading multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) system that maintains an evolving roadmap where features become nodes and transformations form edges. This framework supports three critical capabilities: (1) trajectory-aware planning with intelligent backtracking from local optima, (2) reuse of previously generated intermediate features, and (3) localized contribution tracking that stabilizes the exploration process. During agent learning, experience replay reuses stored transitions and rewards, avoiding repeated downstream-model evaluations for the sampled experiences. Extensive experiments and case studies across diverse benchmark datasets and tasks demonstrate that TCTO achieves superior performance, stability, and traceability, advancing the DCAI paradigm toward intelligent systems that learn not only from data, but to reprogram data itself. 1

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.