Skip to content

Autonomous Resource Allocation for QoS Enhancement in Next-Generation Heterogeneous Wireless Systems

Oct 2026 · Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering
Advanced Wireless Network Optimization

Abstract

The network heterogeneity, high dynamism of traffic demands, channel conditions and diverse Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements in Beyond Fifth-Generation (B5G) and Sixth-Generation (6G) heterogeneous wireless networks create new difficulties for autonomous resource allocation. Static and reactive methods are not adaptable enough, and current learning based methods typically do not have a built-in mechanism for predicting, multi-objective, and temporally stable resource decisions. To fill this, this paper introduces a hybrid Decision Support System (DSS) for autonomous multi-objective resource allocation with Multi-Objective Optimization (MOOP), Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), Predictive Environment Model (PEM) and Stability-Aware Optimization (SAO) under a single decision-making framework. The proposed DSS integrates available network observation data with prediction of environmental conditions and is able to automatically infer resource-allocation decisions based on multiple and possibly competing criteria. DRL enables adaptive policy learning, PEM enables proactively making decisions for the future network state, MOOP enables balancing throughput, latency, fairness and energy efficiency, and SAO enables temporal consistency between successive allocation decisions. The framework also considers Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) and data rate to determine the quality of communication-links. A large number of simulation experiments are performed to compare the proposed DSS with static, reactive and conventional DRL-based resource-allocation methods. It shows that the results are better in the following aspects: Communication efficiency, Resource utilization, Latency, Fairness, and Energy efficiency. Convergence and temporal analyses also show quicker and more regular decision behavior and the SINR and data-rate analyses confirm better communication-link quality under the assumed operational conditions. As a whole, the results indicated that adding AL, PEWA, multi-objective optimization, and stability-aware decision-making to a DSS is a good way to autonomously manage the use of resources in a dynamic B5G and 6G wireless heterogeneous network while maintaining a balance between the conflicting goals.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.