Skip to content

Munich_Z@GermEval Shared Task 2025:When Prompting Is Not Enough: The Limits of Large Language Models in GermEval’s 2025 Harmful Content Detection Task

· 1 citation · 26 references

TL;DR

This work evaluates prompting strategies for subtask 2 of the GermEval 2025 Harmful Content Detection challenge, which involves classifying whether a tweet attacks the free democratic basic order and shows that techniques such as Chain-of-Thought, In-Context Learning or Task Decomposition outperform approaches like Task Description.

View source

Similar papers

Sahara Tokenizers at MWE-2026 PARSEME 2.0 Subtask 1: Combining Contextual Embeddings with Structural Decoding for Multi-Word Expression Detection

Alation studies reveal a strong synergy between POS features and CRF decoding, with the combined approach yielding the best single-model performance, and ensembling models trained with different objectives improves both overall F1 score and discontinuous MWE scores, demonstrating the importance of training diversity fo...

Yunus Karatepe, Mert Sülük, Zeynep Tu˘gçe Kırımlı et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

EVIL-Detect for NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 6: LLM-Generated Text Detection

EVIL-Detect, a multi-signal ensemble framework with conflict-aware fusion for NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 6, improves robustness under strong out-of-distribution shifts, achieving a macro-F1 score of 0.8888 and ranking first in the official evaluation.

Hong-Rui Bao, Hangyu Rong, Zhuo Wang et al. · 1 citation

The Pitfalls of Maximum Likelihood Training of TPMs for Controllable Language Generation

This work finds that likelihood-trained TPMs can result in failed generations due to overly large corrections to the LM’s logits, and trains TPMs with LM-aligned objectives that better align with the LM token-probability space.

Hanzhang Liu, William Zhao, Zi-Lei Shao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.