Aug 2026· Acta Medica Alanya· Vol 10, pp. 143-148· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
Current LLMs demonstrate a high level of factual knowledge in hand surgery board examination questions, and while these models cannot replace formal medical training or clinical judgment, they may serve as supportive tools in orthopedic education and exam preparation.
Abstract
Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly used in medical education and clinical research. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of various large language models (LLMs) in responding to questions related to hand surgery. This evaluation was based on items derived from the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Board Examination administered between 2010 and 2025.Methods: A total of 220 hand surgery–related multiple-choice questions were extracted from national board examinations administered between 2010 and 2025. Questions were posed to three LLMs (ChatGPT-5.0, Gemini-Pro, and DeepSeek-V3) using both collective and individual questioning approaches across three separate sessions. Model responses were compared with the official correct answers, and success rates were calculated descriptively.Results: All three LLMs achieved satisfactory performance across all years, with success rates ranging from 73.6% to 90.9%. Individually asked questions yielded higher average scores compared with collectively asked questions. Year-by-year analysis demonstrated that all models met or exceeded the examination passing threshold throughout the 16-year period.Conclusion: Current LLMs demonstrate a high level of factual knowledge in hand surgery board examination questions. While these models cannot replace formal medical training or clinical judgment, they may serve as supportive tools in orthopedic education and exam preparation.
Current LLMs showed no significant accuracy difference between the Turkish and English examination versions under a constant English prompt, supporting supervised study-aid use on this MCQ format.
Ibrahim Güler, A. Kraus, Gerrit Grieb et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved rapidly in recent years and is becoming increasingly integrated into many areas of medicine. In the medical field, these systems have attracted considerable attention because of their potential applications in clinical decision support, medical education, scientific communicatio...
B. Maciąg, Krzysztof Bujak, Dawid Jegierski et al.· Archives of Orthopaedic and...· 0 citations
To evaluate the performance and potential utility of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in oral and maxillofacial radiology using the board-certification examination administered by the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (JSOMR). The responses generated by ChatGPT for multiple-choice questions f...
ChatGPT 5.2 is a valuable AI–assisted chatbot that facilitates patient education by providing responses regarding sleeve gastrectomy that are generally accurate and acceptable, but the categorization of 4–16% of the responses as "Incorrect," the overall difficult readability levels, and the significant variability obse...
Furkan Türkoğlu, Elif Nur Gencer, Emre Erdoğan· Archives of Current Medical...· 0 citations
All three large language models demonstrated high accuracy on operative dentistry MCQs, suggesting their potential utility as a supplementary educational tool, however, the residual error rates in the answers warrant the cautious integration of LLMs into dental education.
J. M. Antony, Nikhil Harikrishnan, N. Jayasheelan· Frontiers in Dental Medicine· 0 citations
LLMs, especially ChatGPT‐4 and GPT‐4o, show potential as additional tools for MCQ‐based dental anatomy education, however, variability in performance underscores the necessity for thorough evaluation of these tools.
M. B. Mirza, A. Robaian, A. Alqahtani et al.· European Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.