Skip to content
Review Open access

The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting foot and ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

AI algorithms demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for foot and ankle fracture detection and show meaningful clinical utility as adjunctive tools, however, current evidence is insufficient to support robust occult-fracture-specific conclusions.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Foot and ankle fractures, including radiographically subtle or occult injuries, present a diagnostic challenge in emergency settings, with missed diagnoses causing severe complications. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning, offers a promising adjunct for radiographic interpretation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic test accuracy of AI in detecting foot and ankle fractures and appraises the available evidence for occult fracture detection where reported.

Method

Adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 10 May 2026. Studies evaluating AI algorithms for identifying foot and ankle fractures on radiographs or CT were included, with occult-fracture data extracted separately when available. Extracted data populated 2 × 2 contingency tables. We utilized a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Quality was assessed via QUADAS-2.

Results

Sixteen studies encompassing over 37,000 radiographs or images were included. Pooled sensitivity was 92.4% (95% CrI 82.5-96.1%) and pooled specificity was 95.1% (95% CrI 83.3-98.3%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 236.64 (95% CrI 33.56-1087.11). At a 25% pre-test probability, a positive AI result increased post-test probability to 86%, while a negative result reduced it to 3%. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed. Only two studies explicitly reported occult fracture cases; therefore, the pooled estimates primarily reflect AI performance for overall foot and ankle fracture detection rather than occult fractures alone.

Conclusion

AI algorithms demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for foot and ankle fracture detection and show meaningful clinical utility as adjunctive tools. However, current evidence is insufficient to support robust occult-fracture-specific conclusions, and all included studies were retrospective. Prospective validation, standardized reporting of occult fracture subgroups, and real-world impact studies are needed before widespread clinical implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Versus Musculoskeletal Radiologists for Foot and Ankle Fracture Detection on Radiographs

Standalone artificial intelligence achieved high diagnostic performance for foot and ankle fracture detection on radiographs but was less sensitive than MSK radiologists for complex midfoot injuries.

David Ferreira Branco, Paul Botti, Hicham Bouredoucen et al. · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted versus independent physician interpretation for bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

How human-machine collaboration effectively mitigates clinical experience gaps and improves radiologic diagnosis is quantified, which substantially reduces missed fractures and safely bridges the experience gap for junior clinicians, ultimately optimizing patient triage and operational efficiency.

Ming Zhang, Bi-Han Tang, Hao-Ran Dai et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Sep 2026

Evaluating artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hip fractures: an analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.

The Milvue SmartUrgences AI software may provide useful decision support during acute radiographic assessment, but AI output should complement rather than replace clinical and radiological assessment.

M. H. Christensen, Rasmus Elsøe, Firaz Mahdi et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for fracture detection on radiography and computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of externally validated clinician-comparative studies

Current evidence supports AI as an assistive tool, but prospective clinically integrated validation is needed before broad implementation and certainty remains limited by heterogeneity, small numbers of studies with complete 2 × 2 data, and patient-selection concerns.

Oscar Luis Castro Guerrero, Jesús Yesith Goenaga Fruto, L. N. Antonio Vásquez et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Imaging–Based Artificial Intelligence for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AI models demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in imaging-based ONFH diagnosis, however, the current evidence is constrained by the limited number of included studies, predominantly retrospective designs, and a lack of adequate external validation, and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

FeiLong Lu, Li-Rong Wang, Wen-Bin Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery: Current applications, limitations and future directions.

The strongest evidence is in image-based applications, including ankle fracture detection and classification, automated deformity measurements, and three-dimensional analysis of weight-bearing computed tomography.

Osama M. Embaby, Abdulaziz F. Aljehani, Mohamed Elalfy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.