Jun 2026· Dental and Medical Problems· Vol 63 3, pp.
695-705
· 2 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial methodological heterogeneity observed across the included studies, which underscores the importance of establishing standardized criteria and reporting guidelines for orofacial pain in scientific research.
Abstract
Background
Orofacial pain, particularly when chronic and unrelated to dental pathology, presents a considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. To address these issues, the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP), the first comprehensive international classification of orofacial pain, was published in 2020.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the global prevalence of orofacial pain of different origin in accordance with the ICOP classification.
MATERIAL AND
Methods
A systematic search of MEDLINE and Scopus was conducted for observational studies published between 2004 and 2024. Although data were initially intended to be classified according to the ICOP categories, the available studies did not permit the direct application of this classification.
Results
The pooled prevalence estimates were as follows: myofascial orofacial pain - 20.60% (95% CI: 9.71-38.50; 5 studies, 3,395 observations); myofascial pain combined with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain - 11.95% (95% CI: 8.85-15.96; 31 studies, 522,056 observations); TMJ pain alone - 9.51% (95% CI: 6.01-14.73; 13 studies, 21,407 observations); orofacial pain attributed to dentoalveolar and related structures - 27.46% (95% CI: 22.83-32.63; 66 studies, 548,782 observations); and orofacial pain due to cranial nerve lesions or diseases - 7.98% (95% CI: 3.28-18.18; 2 studies, 9,735 observations).
Conclusions
In the global population, the prevalence of myofascial orofacial pain is estimated at 21%. The prevalence of myofascial orofacial pain combined with TMJ pain is reported to be 12%. The prevalence of TMJ pain alone is estimated at 10%. The prevalence of orofacial pain attributed to the disorders of dentoalveolar and anatomically related structures is 27%. The prevalence of orofacial pain attributed to the lesions or diseases of the cranial nerves is 8%. The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial methodological heterogeneity observed across the included studies. This variability underscores the importance of establishing standardized criteria and reporting guidelines for orofacial pain in scientific research.
Introduction and aim: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are among the most common causes of chronic orofacial pain of non-dental origin, with a muscular component dominating in 50–70% of patients. Global prevalence reaches 34%, with marked female predominance and peak incidence at 18–60 years, making masticatory muscle...
A. Szcześniak, Aleksandra Syguda, Weronika Matyja et al.· Quality in Sport· 0 citations
Introduction. Neck pain (NP) and cervicogenic headache (CGH) frequently coexist with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), suggesting a potential need for integrated clinical assessment. However, it remains unclear whether routine screening for TMD is warranted in these populations. This study aimed to synthesize current...
Unknown authors· Advancements in Health Resea...· 0 citations
The anatomical structure, biomechanics, and condylar movement pathways of the temporomandibular joint are described and the terminology, classification, etiology, and clinical features of temporomandibular disorders in light of current literature are evaluated.
Ayşenur Uludağ, Ela Türmeli, Mevsim Yayman et al.· Selcuk Dental Journal· 0 citations
The study focuses on the association between reduced distal occlusal support, clinical and imaging signs of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and anxiety-depressive symptoms in patients with chronic orofacial pain. The aim was to assess, using a retrospective review of clinical practice, whether an individual relaxa...
Sergey Brodsky, Dmitry Salatsky· The actual problems in denti...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Biofeedback therapy is increasingly used to manage myofascial orofacial pain and bruxism, but the overall strength and consistency of the evidence remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES
This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate evidence from systematic reviews on the effectiveness of biofeedback...
Celine Beriger, Kathrin Kohout, Aleksandra Zumbrunn et al.· Journal of Oral Rehabilitati...· 0 citations
Results indicate a potential association between TMD-related symptoms and MSDs, suggesting that orofacial pain and functional jaw impairment may be related to male sexual health.
Ümit Erkut, Abdurrahim Yıldız, R. Mustafaoğlu· Sao Paulo medical journal =...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.