Sep 2026· Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science· Vol 3, pp. 478-487· 0 citations· 25 references
TL;DR
A detailed comparative analysis of five state-of-the-art models in a zero-shot translation paradigm between English and four typologically different languages, Indic languages: Gujarati, Malayalam, Hindi, and Tamil indicates that there is significant performance difference among language pairs, translation directions and models.
Abstract
The recent outbreak of Large Language Models~(LLMs) has radically changed the state of machine translation~(MT), which has provided fresh possibilities to low-resource and morphologically rich language pairs. The paper is a detailed comparative analysis of five state-of-the-art models, BLOOMZ, IndicTrans2, Krutrim, Sarvam~AI, and Aya-101, in a zero-shot translation paradigm between English and four typologically different languages, Indic languages: Gujarati, Malayalam, Hindi, and Tamil. The analysis compares general-purpose multilingual LLMs to specialised neural machine translation systems (NMT) in a systematic way balancing the generality of multilingual coverage and task specialisation. Every model is tested on the FLORES-200 DevTest corpus against three complementary testing metrics, BLEU, chrF++ and COMET. The languages selected represent two different linguistic families, that is, Indo-Aryan (Hindi, Gujarati) and Dravidian (Tamil, Malayalam), which gives them a principled ground of cross-family comparison. Experimentation findings indicate that there is significant performance difference among language pairs, translation directions and models. Specialised Indic models are proven to have marked morphologically rich languages of Dravidian language families on both semantic and character-level measures, LLM instruction-tuned models are also shown to achieve good performance in limited resources environments with respect to BLEU. The results of our work provide practical recommendations in the selection of LLM in the production Indic MT pipeline and emphasize the importance of the linguistic family factor in the assessment of the multilingual model.
COILD, an Indic-centric parallel corpus comprising over 1.16 million human-translated and human-verified sentence pairs, covers 20 Indian language pairs across the Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Tibeto-Burman, and Austro-Asiatic language families, and provides a valuable training and evaluation resource for advancing multiling...
Kshetrimayum Boynao Singh, Nitin Kumar Mishra, P. Dutta et al.· 0 citations
This paper analyses various recent state-of-the-art variants of large language models (LLMs) and neural machine translation (NMT) for Indian languages in comparison to statistical machine translation (SMT) and tackles key questions, such as idiomatic expressions, morphologically complex grammar or the scarceness of par...
Jayanand A. Kamble, Shivajirao M. Jadhav, V. J. Kadam· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
A corpus containing both manually curated and synthetically generated sentences for low-resource Indian languages, such as Maithili is contributed and it is demonstrated that, even with a smaller corpus size, high-quality, task-specific data significantly enhance translation accuracy for low-resource Indian languages,...
Kamanksha Prasad Dubey, C. Maurya, Kumar Padmanabh· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work introduces the first-of-its-kind English-Assamese parallel corpus for the translation of Indian court judgments and performs a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art multilingual models in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings, comparing their performance against commercial systems.
Telem Joyson Singh, Hemanta Baruah, Sanasam Ranbir Singh et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.