Skip to content

Parrot Mambo Minidrone as a benchmark platform for low-cost UAV research: a review of control, autonomy, software validation, safety and experimental evaluation

Oct 2026 · Figshare
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems

Abstract

Low-cost minidrone platforms are increasingly used in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) research for safe indoor experimentation, controller development and engineering education. The Parrot Mambo Minidrone is particularly attractive because of its compact size, onboard sensing, MATLAB/Simulink compatibility and suitability for real-time validation. This review critically synthesises 137 studies published between 2018 and 2026 involving the Parrot Mambo, including studies where it appears alongside other UAV platforms. The literature spans modelling, state estimation, classical and intelligent control, robust nonlinear control, disturbance rejection, vision-based navigation, multi-UAV coordination, Human-Drone Interaction (HDI), software validation, cyber-resilience, education, safety analysis, energy-aware evaluation and hardware performance. A platform-centred taxonomy is developed to trace progression from Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)-based stabilisation toward adaptive, intelligent, perception-driven, software-aware and safety-conscious autonomy. PID and Proportional-Integral–Proportional-Derivative (PI-PD) controllers remain important baselines, while fuzzy-PID, Sliding Mode Control (SMC), Model Predictive Control (MPC), Model-Free Control (MFC), Reinforcement Learning (RL), Observer-Based Control (OBC) and Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) address nonlinearities, disturbances, uncertainty and hardware constraints. However, software testing, cyber-resilience, fault diagnosis, reachability analysis, actuator health, aerodynamic constraints and energy-aware evaluation remain weakly integrated. The principal gap is the absence of a standardised benchmark jointly assessing control accuracy, robustness, perception reliability, energy use, computational load, software dependability, cyber-resilience, safety, actuator constraints and real-flight repeatability. Accordingly, this review proposes a benchmark-driven framework for integrated, safety-aware, hardware-aware and reproducible Parrot Mambo research.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.