Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Dataset Open access

Does AI-based building energy optimisation deliver net energy savings? Code, hardware energy-measurement logs and results

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Abstract

Code, per-job hardware energy-measurement logs, classical-controller results, derived tables and figure scripts for the study "Does AI-based building energy optimisation deliver net energy savings? A measured life-cycle assessment of computational energy against operational benefits across 2,000+ building–climate–algorithm configurations" (research article, 2026; the reference will be added once published). The archive contains:(1) the energy-measurement module (Intel RAPL via Windows performance counters, NVIDIA NVML power integration, CPU-time-share apportioning of package energy to processes, calibrated against isolated runs);(2) a vectorised 2R2C gray-box building testbed with six archetypes and 23 climates, rule-based, model-predictive (cvxpy/Clarabel) and deep reinforcement learning controllers (PPO, SAC, DQN; Stable-Baselines3), and the experiment grids: 1,525 measured DRL training runs and 1,380 classical building-years;(3) battery/PV dispatch experiments on the 17 real homes of the CityLearn Challenge 2022 (LP, receding-horizon LP, DRL, shared fleet policy);(4) a day-ahead load-forecasting zoo on 1,246 real meters of the Building Data Genome Project 2 (persistence, ridge, LightGBM, per-building and global MLP/GRU/Transformer) with forecast-driven dispatch;(5) EnergyPlus 26.2 simulation-energy measurements and EnergyPlus-in-the-loop RL training;(6) a Monte-Carlo (20,000 draws) and Sobol life-cycle model for five deployment architectures, fleet sizes and shared policies, with break-even savings by building archetype;(7) every derived table and figure, one JSON record per training run (arguments, hardware, raw counter readings, apportioned energy, in-sample and out-of-sample evaluation, inference energy, thermostat baselines). Reproduction: see README.md (pip install -r requirements.txt; the analysis and figure scripts regenerate every table and figure from the included records in minutes; the full experiment pipeline takes about three days on a 24-thread laptop). Hardware and measurement details are in ENVIRONMENT.md. Licences: code MIT; data, logs, tables and figures CC BY 4.0. Third-party inputs keep their original terms (climate.onebuilding.org weather files, CityLearn 2022 dataset [MIT], Building Data Genome 2 [MIT], Ember/Our World in Data carbon intensities [CC BY 4.0]); see LICENSE-DATA.md. Not included (regenerable with the scripts): trained model checkpoints (1.0 GB), Tier-3 forecast arrays (0.66 GB), EnergyPlus binary outputs (0.25 GB), the EnergyPlus installer and the 167 MB BDG2 raw meter file (download links in README.md).

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.