Aug 2026· Global Change Biology· Vol 32· 0 citations· 86 references
Medicine
Abstract
Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to persistent soil organic carbon (SOC), yet its response to climate warming and the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a global meta‐analysis to assess how total MNC, fungal necromass carbon (FNC), and bacterial necromass carbon (BNC) respond to warming and to identify the key drivers. Overall, warming had no significant net effect on total MNC, FNC, or BNC across all observations, although publication bias‐corrected analyses revealed a significant 8.6% increase in FNC. However, warming effects varied substantially among ecosystems, increasing MNC accumulation in permafrost (+25.4%), grassland (+8.2%), and cropland (+9.9%) soils, while decreasing it in forests (−12.4%) and showing no significant effect in wetlands. Warming effects were further influenced by warming method, soil depth, climatic conditions, and initial soil properties. Meta‐regression analyses showed that warming‐induced changes in microbial biomass were the strongest predictor of MNC responses, highlighting the central role of microbial growth and turnover in regulating necromass dynamics. Moreover, shifts in nutrient availability, soil pH, and extracellular enzyme activities significantly influenced the balance between necromass production and decomposition. Positive coupling between MNC and SOC responses suggests that microbial necromass formation represents an important mechanism linking microbial processes to soil carbon persistence under warming. Overall, our findings demonstrate that warming affects MNC by altering microbial traits and nutrient availability, thereby regulating the balance between necromass production and decomposition. Ecosystem‐specific conditions further determine the magnitude and direction of these responses. These findings highlight the need to incorporate microbial necromass dynamics into predictions of soil carbon‐climate feedbacks under future warming scenarios.
Nutrient inputs can simultaneously regulate microbial necromass formation and soil organic carbon (SOC) accrual, but whether the contribution of microbial necromass to SOC changes over time under nutrient addition, and whether this temporal dependence differs among residue components remains unclear. We synthesized 303...
Peng Zhang, Yu'e Li, Chen-Yang Zhang et al.· Global Biogeochemical Cycles· 0 citations
Soil viruses are increasingly recognized as important biotic components influencing microbial community dynamics and soil carbon cycling. However, how altered precipitation affects the accumulation of microbial necromass carbon (MNC), a major contributor to stable soil organic carbon (SOC), remains unclear, particula...
Cui Han, Jing Chen, Xu Luo et al.· Journal of Plant Ecology· 0 citations
Climate change reshapes global terrestrial ecosystems via rising temperatures and shifting precipitation, jointly regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics. Multi-factorial experiments are vital for unraveling climatic interactions, yet most only apply one warming level, leaving ecosystem nonlinear responses poor...
Meirong Chen, Li-Li Jiang, Xing-Liang Xu et al.· Communications Earth & E...· 0 citations
Microplastics (MPs) pollution in agricultural soils alters global carbon cycling, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Through a global meta-analysis of 1230 observations from 89 studies, we show that MPs exposure increased soil organic carbon (SOC) by 27.1%, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by 16.3%,...
Bing-Yu Zhu, Xiao-Bo Gu, Ya-Dan Du et al.· Journal of Hazardous Materia...· 0 citations
Agricultural management profoundly influences soil carbon (C) dynamics by regulating microbial processes that drive C cycling. However, a comprehensive and globally integrated understanding of these mechanisms remains limited. In this study, we defined soil microbial carbon economic strategies (MCES) as four linked...
Yi-Qing Wang, Jing-Hui He, J. Peñuelas et al.· European Journal of Soil Sci...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.