Skip to content
Open access

Plurality, transdisciplinarity and consensus: utopias of research ethics committees

2026 · Revista Bioética · Vol 34 · 0 citations · 25 references

Abstract

Abstract Research Ethics Committees must promote sensitive, reliable, and truthful science by ensuring the validity and traceability of studies, maintaining ongoing dialogue with the scientific community, and protecting participants. It is essential to assess whether their management fulfills these guarantees. Understanding the challenges faced by Research Ethics Committees regarding pluralism, transdisciplinarity, and consensus is therefore necessary. Interviews were conducted with members of Research Ethics Committees from Latin American countries to explore challenges, consensus, and experiences through a phenomenological analysis. A disconnect is observed between the normative utopia and the practical reality of Research Ethics Committees, with epistemological tensions related to ethical conceptions and decision-making models, as well as political tensions influenced by personal and institutional interests. To move toward plural integration, multidisciplinary, inclusive, and deliberative teams are required, with ethical training and a commitment to research integrity.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Quantifying ethics: Dilemmas in the governance of contemporary science

Scientific integrity constitutes the ethical and methodological foundation of knowledge production, ensuring its credibility and social legitimacy. However, in today’s culture of quantification, ethics runs the risk of becoming a set of metrics and protocols that replace moral reflection and individual responsibility...

J. C. Alcazar-Gonzales, B. S. Alcántara-Asencios · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

ABCDE of Deception: A Relational Research Ethics Proposal.

Various research ethics frameworks and guidelines assist researchers and research ethics committees (RECs) with ensuring ethically justified deception of participants. However, there remain challenges with balancing context-sensitivity and consistency: when applying ethics requirements during REC review; when handling...

Kamiel Verbeke, Dieter Baeyens, Jan Piasecki et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Navigating Everyday Ethical Challenges in Evaluation: A Framework for Reflection and Action

Ethical considerations are central to evaluation practice, both in formal approval processes and in the everyday realities of managing relationships, power, and integrity. Even evaluators adept at meeting procedural ethics requirements and complying with formal expectations such as those expressed in policies and guide...

Kristy Hornby, S. Main, Su-Ann Drew et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Navigating the "Ethical Bureaucracy": A Comparative Empirical Study of New Media Research Ethics in Türkiye and Global Contexts.

The rapid evolution of networked environments has intensified ethical challenges in media research, highlighting the need to move beyond procedural compliance toward more reflexive practices. This study examines the lived experiences and ethical dilemmas encountered by new media researchers through a comparative qualit...

Hasan Hüseyin Kayış · 0 citations
Review 2026

[The stigma of vulnerability and the autonomy fallacy in care. Ethical keys from a relational anthropology].

An argumentative synthesis based on a systematic literature review of vulnerable individuals and populations from January 2015 to August 2025 concludes that the ethical quality of clinical, institutional, and regulatory responses depends on achieving a balance between protection and inclusion through personalized asses...

María Antonia Quesada Blasco, L. E. Echarte-Alonso, M. V. Roqué-Sánchez · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.