Skip to content
Review

Artificial Intelligence Models Based on Medical Imaging Achieve Accurate Detection of Rotator Cuff Tear and Initial Predictive Capability for Postoperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Oct 2026 · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related · 0 citations · 68 references
Medicine

TL;DR

AI models significantly improved diagnostic accuracy based on medical imaging and showed promising predictive performance, particularly regarding rotator cuff retear, however, predictions related to functional scores exhibited relatively lower accuracy.

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) compared with physicians in detecting rotator cuff tear (RCT) on medical imaging and evaluating the ability of AI to predict outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 15, 2025. The criteria were as follows: (1) original studies employing AI to detect RCT or predict outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and (2) case reports, reviews, and editorials were excluded. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

Results

A total of 37 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, encompassing 46,593 patients. The mean age of the patients was 55.8 years, with an average female representation of 52.2%. AI models developed for diagnosing RCT using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and radiographic images showed excellent performance, achieving average area under the curves and accuracies of 89.5% and 0.93, 91% and 0.97, and 84% and 0.86, respectively. AI models using radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging have shown performance in diagnosing RCT that surpasses that of junior clinicians, with magnetic resonance imaging-based models performing at a level comparable to senior clinicians. AI models developed to predict retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed an average accuracy of 83.4% and an area under the curve of 0.83. Older and women were the most common risk factors for postoperative retear identified in the included studies.

Conclusions

AI models significantly improved diagnostic accuracy based on medical imaging and showed promising predictive performance, particularly regarding rotator cuff retear. However, predictions related to functional scores exhibited relatively lower accuracy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Imaging–Based Artificial Intelligence for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AI models demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in imaging-based ONFH diagnosis, however, the current evidence is constrained by the limited number of included studies, predominantly retrospective designs, and a lack of adequate external validation, and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

FeiLong Lu, Li-Rong Wang, Wen-Bin Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted versus independent physician interpretation for bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

How human-machine collaboration effectively mitigates clinical experience gaps and improves radiologic diagnosis is quantified, which substantially reduces missed fractures and safely bridges the experience gap for junior clinicians, ultimately optimizing patient triage and operational efficiency.

Ming Zhang, Bi-Han Tang, Hao-Ran Dai et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis in Medical Imaging and Pathology: A Systematic Review of Reported Discriminative Performance with an Exploratory Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly evaluated for diagnosis in medical imaging and pathology, but reported performance depends on validation strategy. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science were searched for open-access English-language studies from Januar...

D. Maltsev, Hanna Fedoryshyn, Svitlana Myslovska et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of AI-augmented renal ultrasound for degenerative kidney disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Artificial intelligence-augmented renal ultrasound shows promising diagnostic performance, but heterogeneous populations, limited calibration, and predominantly internal validation constrain clinical generalizability.

M. Elhaie, Abolfazl Koozari, Amirsaman Soleimani Nasab et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.